Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 79.5 | 94.6 |
| Basic Information | |
| Xiaomi | Samsung |
| Android 11 | Android 11, 10 |
| 2021-05-26 | 2020-09-18 |
| 6.37 x 2.97 x 0.35 inches | 6.27 x 5.05 x 0.27 inches |
| 6.70 ounces | 9.95 ounces |
| Aurora Green, Chrome Silver, Graphite Gray and Nighttime Blue | Mystic black and Mystic bronze |
| -- | Aluminum and Glass |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 199.00 | $ 1930.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.5 inches | 7.6 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2208 x 1768 pixels |
| AMOLED | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 405 pixels per inch | 372 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| MediaTek Dimensity 700 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 865+ SM8250-AB chipset |
| Arm Cortex-A76 and Arm Cortex-A55, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor | Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 3100 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 12 GB RAM |
| Arm Mali-G57 MC2 GPU | Adreno 650 GPU |
| 9.18 | 9.81 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 7.7 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | 0.57 inches (1/1.76") sensor |
| -- | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 9.79 | 10.45 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Battery | 4500mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6.8 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Infra-red port | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Galaxy Z Fold 2 has a score of 94.6, which is much better than Xiaomi Redmi Note 10 5G's score of 79.5. Both devices we are comparing here have the same Android 11 OS (operating system), so they should give all the same OS features. Even though the Galaxy Z Fold 2 and Xiaomi Redmi Note 10 5G were only released 8 months apart, Galaxy Z Fold 2's construction is heavier but also noticeably thinner than Xiaomi Redmi Note 10 5G.
The Galaxy Z Fold 2 has a little better processing power than Xiaomi Redmi Note 10 5G, and although they both have 8 processing cores, the Galaxy Z Fold 2 also has a greater amount of RAM memory. The Galaxy Z Fold 2 and Xiaomi Redmi Note 10 5G both have similar displays, because although the Galaxy Z Fold 2 has a quite lower pixels density, it also counts with a larger display and a better resolution of 1768 x 2208px.
The Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 2 has much more memory capacity to install games and applications than Xiaomi Redmi Note 10 5G, because it has more internal storage capacity. Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 2 captures slightly better photos and videos than Xiaomi Redmi Note 10 5G, because although it has a back-facing camera with a way lower 12 MP resolution, and they both have a F1.8 aperture, the Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 2 also counts with a larger back-facing camera sensor.
The Xiaomi Redmi Note 10 5G counts with just a bit better battery lifetime than Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 2, because it has an 11% greater battery size.
Although Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 2 is a better device, it is way more expensive than the Xiaomi Redmi Note 10 5G, and it doesn't have such a good relation between it's price and quality as the Xiaomi Redmi Note 10 5G. So if you need that extra features and specs, you can buy the Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 2, else you can save some dollars and get the Xiaomi Redmi Note 10 5G, letting go some features and specs.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.