Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 82.4 | 88.1 |
| Basic Information | |
| Xiaomi | Apple |
| Android 11 | -- |
| 2021-03-24 | 2017-11-03 |
| 6.46 x 3.01 x 0.32 inches | 5.65 x 2.79 x 0.30 inches |
| 6.77 ounces | 6.14 ounces |
| Glacier Blue, Gradient Bronze and Onyx Gray | Silver and Space gray |
| Glass | Glass and Stainless steel |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 279.00 | $ 1149.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 5.8 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2436 x 1125 pixels |
| AMOLED | OLED |
| 393 pixels per inch | 463 pixels per inch |
| 1200 cd/m2 brightness | 625 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 9 | 8.9 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 732G SM7150-AC chipset | Apple A11 Bionic APL1W72 (10 nm) chipset |
| Kryo 470, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor | 64-bit Monsoon and Mistral, 64-bit (Hexa-Core 2390 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 3 GB RAM |
| Adreno 618 GPU | Apple 3-core GPU GPU |
| 9.36 | 10.17 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 11.74 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 108.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 7.00 MP |
| f/1.90 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 28.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.33 inches (1/3") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 12.1 | 10.12 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5020mAh Battery | 2716mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6.8 | 4.72 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Infra-red port | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | -- |
| Accelerometer, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
IPhone X has a score of 88.1, which is just a bit better than the Xiaomi Redmi Note 10 Pro's score of 82.4. IPhone X is an notably older phone than the Xiaomi Redmi Note 10 Pro, but it's just a little lighter and just a little thinner anyway. Xiaomi Redmi Note 10 Pro counts with a slightly better looking display than iPhone X, because although it has a little less pixels per screen inch and a bit lower resolution of 1080 x 2400px, it also counts with much more brightness and a bigger display.
IPhone X has a bit more powerful processing unit than Xiaomi Redmi Note 10 Pro, because although it has 2 less cores and 3 GB lesser RAM memory, it also counts with a 64-bits processing unit. The iPhone X counts with a greater memory capacity to install games and applications than Xiaomi Redmi Note 10 Pro, because although it has no SD memory slot, it also counts with more internal storage.
Xiaomi Redmi Note 10 Pro takes better photographs and videos than iPhone X, because although it has a smaller aperture and slower video frame rates, and they both have the same 3840x2160 (4K) video quality, the Xiaomi Redmi Note 10 Pro also counts with a much higher resolution camera in the back.
The Xiaomi Redmi Note 10 Pro counts with a superior battery life than Apple iPhone X, because it has 5020mAh of battery capacity instead of 2716mAh.
Although iPhone X is a better device, it is a lot more expensive than the Xiaomi Redmi Note 10 Pro, and it doesn't have such a good price and quality relation as the Xiaomi Redmi Note 10 Pro. So if you want that extra features, you can buy the iPhone X, but if you don't you can save some money and get the Xiaomi Redmi Note 10 Pro, letting go a couple specs and features.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.