Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 82.4 | 82.5 |
| Basic Information | |
| Xiaomi | |
| Android 11 | -- |
| 2021-03-24 | 2017-10-19 |
| 6.46 x 3.01 x 0.32 inches | 6.22 x 3.02 x 0.31 inches |
| 6.77 ounces | 6.17 ounces |
| Glacier Blue, Gradient Bronze and Onyx Gray | Black and White |
| Glass | Aluminum and Glass |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 279.00 | $ 152.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 6 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2880 x 1440 pixels |
| AMOLED | P-OLED |
| 393 pixels per inch | 537 pixels per inch |
| 1200 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 9 | 8.7 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 732G SM7150-AC chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 835 MSM8998 chipset |
| Kryo 470, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor | Kryo 280, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2350 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 618 GPU | Adreno 540 GPU |
| 9.36 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 11.74 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 108.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 12.20 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.90 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 27.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.38 inches (1/2.6") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 12.1 | 9.79 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5020mAh Battery | 3520mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.8 | 5.52 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Infra-red port | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Google Pixel 2 XL is slightly better than Xiaomi Redmi Note 10 Pro, with an 82.5 score against 82.4. Despite of the fact that Google Pixel 2 XL is way older than the Xiaomi Redmi Note 10 Pro, it's design is a little thinner and a bit lighter. The Xiaomi Redmi Note 10 Pro has a bit more vivid display than Google Pixel 2 XL, because although it has a lot lower 1080 x 2400 resolution and a much lower display pixels density, it also counts with a little bit larger screen.
Xiaomi Redmi Note 10 Pro counts with a bigger memory capacity for games and applications than Google Pixel 2 XL, because although it has just 64 GB internal storage, it also counts with an external SD slot that allows a maximum of 512 GB. The Xiaomi Redmi Note 10 Pro counts with a little faster processor than Google Pixel 2 XL, and although they both have the same number of cores, the Xiaomi Redmi Note 10 Pro also has more RAM memory.
Xiaomi Redmi Note 10 Pro shoots way better photos and videos than Google Pixel 2 XL, because although it has a smaller diafragm aperture which is not nice for low light captures and video, and they both have the same video frame rate and the same 3840x2160 (4K) video resolution, the Xiaomi Redmi Note 10 Pro also counts with a camera in the back with a much better resolution.
The Xiaomi Redmi Note 10 Pro has a superior battery duration than Google Pixel 2 XL, because it has a 43% greater battery size.
Google Pixel 2 XL is not only the best phones between the ones we are comparing here, but it's also by far the cheapest one, which makes this phone a great choice.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.