Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 82.4 | 80 |
| Basic Information | |
| Xiaomi | |
| Android 11 | -- |
| 2021-03-24 | 2018-10-18 |
| 6.46 x 3.01 x 0.32 inches | 5.73 x 2.69 x 0.31 inches |
| 6.77 ounces | 5.22 ounces |
| Glacier Blue, Gradient Bronze and Onyx Gray | Black, Pink and White |
| Glass | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 279.00 | $ 157.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 5.5 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2160 x 1080 pixels |
| AMOLED | P-OLED |
| 393 pixels per inch | 439 pixels per inch |
| 1200 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 9 | 8.3 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 732G SM7150-AC chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 SDM845 chipset |
| Kryo 470, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor | Kryo 385, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2500 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 618 GPU | Adreno 630 GPU |
| 9.36 | 9.36 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 11.74 | 7.7 |
| Camera | |
| 108.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 12.20 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.90 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 28.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 12.1 | 9.79 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5020mAh Battery | 2915mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6.8 | 4.88 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Infra-red port | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Xiaomi Redmi Note 10 Pro has a score of 82.4, which is just a bit better than Google Pixel 3's general score of 80. Xiaomi Redmi Note 10 Pro is a notably newer cellphone than Google Pixel 3, although it is just a little bit thicker and heavier. Google Pixel 3 counts with a processor that's very similar to the processor in Xiaomi Redmi Note 10 Pro, and although the Google Pixel 3 has 2 GB lesser RAM memory, they both have a Octa-Core processor.
Xiaomi Redmi Note 10 Pro features a little sharper screen than Google Pixel 3, because although it has a bit less pixels per screen inch, it also counts with a slightly higher resolution of 1080 x 2400 pixels and a larger screen. The Xiaomi Redmi Note 10 Pro counts with a lot bigger memory for applications and games than Google Pixel 3, and although they both have exactly the same 64 GB internal memory, the Xiaomi Redmi Note 10 Pro also has an external SD slot that holds a maximum of 512 GB.
Xiaomi Redmi Note 10 Pro counts with a very superior camera than Google Pixel 3, because although it has a tinier aperture, and they both have the same 30 fps video frame rates and the same 3840x2160 video definition, the Xiaomi Redmi Note 10 Pro also counts with a back camera with a lot better 108 MP resolution.
The Xiaomi Redmi Note 10 Pro counts with a much longer battery life than Google Pixel 3, because it has 5020mAh of battery capacity instead of 2915mAh.
Although Xiaomi Redmi Note 10 Pro is a better device, it is way more expensive than Google Pixel 3, and it doesn't have such a good price and quality relation as Google Pixel 3. So if you need that extra features and specs, you can buy Xiaomi Redmi Note 10 Pro, otherwise you can save some money and buy the Google Pixel 3, letting go some specifications.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.