Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 82.4 | 78.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| Xiaomi | |
| Android 11 | Android 11, 10, 9.0 Pie |
| 2021-03-24 | 2019-05-07 |
| 6.46 x 3.01 x 0.32 inches | 5.96 x 2.76 x 0.32 inches |
| 6.77 ounces | 5.19 ounces |
| Glacier Blue, Gradient Bronze and Onyx Gray | Black, Purple and White |
| Glass | Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 279.00 | $ 186.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 5.6 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2220 x 1080 pixels |
| AMOLED | OLED |
| 393 pixels per inch | 441 pixels per inch |
| 1200 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 9 | 8.2 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 732G SM7150-AC chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 670 SDM670 chipset |
| Kryo 470, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor | Kryo 360, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 618 GPU | Adreno 615 GPU |
| 9.36 | 9.09 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 11.74 | 7.7 |
| Camera | |
| 108.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 12.20 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.90 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 28.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 12.1 | 9.79 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5020mAh Battery | 3000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.8 | 4.96 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Infra-red port | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Xiaomi Redmi Note 10 Pro has an overall score of 82.4, which is a little bit better than the Google Pixel 3a's 78.8 general score. The Xiaomi Redmi Note 10 Pro construction has the same thickness than Google Pixel 3a, but it is a lot heavier. These phones use the same Android 11 OS (Operating System), so you shouldn't see any differences regarding OS features.
The Xiaomi Redmi Note 10 Pro features a bit sharper screen than Google Pixel 3a, because although it has a just a little worse quantity of pixels per inch of display, it also counts with a larger screen and a quite better 1080 x 2400 resolution. The Xiaomi Redmi Note 10 Pro features a very superior memory for games and applications than Google Pixel 3a, and although they both have the same internal storage capacity, the Xiaomi Redmi Note 10 Pro also has an external SD slot that supports up to 512 GB.
Xiaomi Redmi Note 10 Pro counts with a bit better CPU than Google Pixel 3a, and although they both have the same number of cores, the Xiaomi Redmi Note 10 Pro also has more RAM memory. Xiaomi Redmi Note 10 Pro counts with a really longer battery life than Google Pixel 3a, because it has 5020mAh of battery capacity against 3000mAh.
The Xiaomi Redmi Note 10 Pro has a very superior camera than Google Pixel 3a, because although it has a tinier camera aperture, and they both have the same 3840x2160 (4K) video quality and the same video frame rate, the Xiaomi Redmi Note 10 Pro also counts with a back camera with a way higher resolution.
Although Xiaomi Redmi Note 10 Pro is a better device, it is way more expensive than Google Pixel 3a, and it doesn't have such a good quality/price relation as the Google Pixel 3a. So if you want that extra specs, you can buy Xiaomi Redmi Note 10 Pro, but if you don't you can save some dollars and get the Google Pixel 3a, resigning a couple specifications.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.