Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 82.4 | 82.9 |
| Basic Information | |
| Xiaomi | |
| Android 11 | Android 11, 10 |
| 2021-03-24 | 2020-08-20 |
| 6.46 x 3.01 x 0.32 inches | 5.67 x 2.73 x 0.32 inches |
| 6.77 ounces | 5.04 ounces |
| Glacier Blue, Gradient Bronze and Onyx Gray | Just black |
| Glass | Plastic and Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 279.00 | $ 349.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 5.8 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| AMOLED | OLED |
| 393 pixels per inch | 444 pixels per inch |
| 1200 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 9 | 8.3 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 732G SM7150-AC chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G SM7150-AA chipset |
| Kryo 470, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor | Kryo 470, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 618 GPU | Adreno 618 GPU |
| 9.36 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 11.74 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 108.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 12.20 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.90 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| -- | 27.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 12.1 | 9.79 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5020mAh Battery | 3140mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.8 | 5.12 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.1 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Infra-red port | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Google Pixel 4a has a global score of 82.9, which is a little bit better than the Xiaomi Redmi Note 10 Pro's score of 82.4. The Google Pixel 4a design has the same thickness than Xiaomi Redmi Note 10 Pro, but it is notably lighter. These phones work with the same Android 11 OS, so both of them should give very similar OS features.
The Xiaomi Redmi Note 10 Pro has a little better processing power than Google Pixel 4a. Both have the same number of cores and a 6 GB RAM. The Xiaomi Redmi Note 10 Pro counts with just a bit better screen than Google Pixel 4a, because although it has a just a little worse display density, it also counts with a bit higher 1080 x 2400 resolution and a bigger display.
Xiaomi Redmi Note 10 Pro counts with more memory capacity to install games and applications than Google Pixel 4a, because although it has 0 less internal memory capacity, it also counts with a slot for an SD memory card that admits up to 512 GB. The Xiaomi Redmi Note 10 Pro counts with a much better camera than Google Pixel 4a, because although it has a tinier camera aperture, and they both have the same video frame rates and the same video resolution, the Xiaomi Redmi Note 10 Pro also counts with a way more mega pixels back camera.
The Xiaomi Redmi Note 10 Pro has a way better battery performance than Google Pixel 4a, because it has 5020mAh of battery capacity.
Although Google Pixel 4a is a better device, it costs more than Xiaomi Redmi Note 10 Pro, and it doesn't have such a good relation between it's price and quality as the Xiaomi Redmi Note 10 Pro. If you want to save a few dollars, you can get Xiaomi Redmi Note 10 Pro, giving up a few features and specifications, but you'll get the most out of your budget.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.