Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 82.4 | 87.5 |
| Basic Information | |
| Xiaomi | |
| Android 11 | Android 11 |
| 2021-03-24 | 2020-11-19 |
| 6.46 x 3.01 x 0.32 inches | 6.06 x 2.91 x 0.32 inches |
| 6.77 ounces | 5.93 ounces |
| Glacier Blue, Gradient Bronze and Onyx Gray | Clearly white and Just black |
| Glass | Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 279.00 | $ 500.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 6.2 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| AMOLED | OLED |
| 393 pixels per inch | 416 pixels per inch |
| 1200 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 9 | 8.2 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 732G SM7150-AC chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G SM7250-AB chipset |
| Kryo 470, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor | Kryo 475, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2400 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 618 GPU | Adreno 620 GPU |
| 9.36 | 9.36 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 11.74 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 108.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 12.20 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.90 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| -- | 28.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 12.1 | 10.23 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5020mAh Battery | 3885mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.8 | 5.84 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Infra-red port | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Google Pixel 4a 5G has a general score of 87.5, which is a bit better than Xiaomi Redmi Note 10 Pro's 82.4 general score. Both phones in our current comparison have the same Android 11 operating system. The Google Pixel 4a 5G construction has the same thickness than Xiaomi Redmi Note 10 Pro, but it is somewhat lighter.
The Xiaomi Redmi Note 10 Pro counts with a little more vivid screen than Google Pixel 4a 5G, because although it has a little bit lower pixel number per inch of screen, it also counts with a slightly better resolution of 1080 x 2400px and a bit bigger display. Xiaomi Redmi Note 10 Pro and Google Pixel 4a 5G feature incredibly similar CPUs, both have the same RAM amount and 8 CPU cores.
Xiaomi Redmi Note 10 Pro shoots much better photographs and videos than Google Pixel 4a 5G, because although it has a smaller aperture and slower 30 frames per second video frame rate, and they both have the same 3840x2160 video quality, the Xiaomi Redmi Note 10 Pro also counts with a way better 108 megapixels resolution back facing camera.
Xiaomi Redmi Note 10 Pro features a bigger memory to install games and applications than Google Pixel 4a 5G, because although it has only 64 GB internal memory, it also counts with a SD card slot that admits a maximum of 512 GB. The Xiaomi Redmi Note 10 Pro features better battery performance than Google Pixel 4a 5G, because it has 5020mAh of battery capacity against 3885mAh.
Although Google Pixel 4a 5G is a better device, it costs a lot more than Xiaomi Redmi Note 10 Pro, and it doesn't have such a good relation between it's price and quality as Xiaomi Redmi Note 10 Pro. If you prefer to save some money, you can buy Xiaomi Redmi Note 10 Pro, giving up a few features and specs, but you'll get the most out of your savings.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.