Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 82.4 | 89 |
| Basic Information | |
| Xiaomi | |
| Android 11 | -- |
| 2021-03-24 | 2020-10-15 |
| 6.46 x 3.01 x 0.32 inches | 5.70 x 2.77 x 0.31 inches |
| 6.77 ounces | 5.33 ounces |
| Glacier Blue, Gradient Bronze and Onyx Gray | Just black and Sorta sage |
| Glass | Aluminum and Aluminum |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 279.00 | $ 548.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 6 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| AMOLED | OLED |
| 393 pixels per inch | 430 pixels per inch |
| 1200 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 9 | 8.2 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 732G SM7150-AC chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G SM7250-AB chipset |
| Kryo 470, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor | Kryo 475, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2400 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Adreno 618 GPU | Adreno 620 GPU |
| 9.36 | 9.45 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 11.74 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 108.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 12.20 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.90 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| -- | 28.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 12.1 | 10.23 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5020mAh Battery | 4080mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6.8 | 6 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Infra-red port | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Google Pixel 5 has a general score of 89, which is slightly better than the Xiaomi Redmi Note 10 Pro's 82.4 score. The Google Pixel 5 is a notably lighter and just a bit thinner phone than Xiaomi Redmi Note 10 Pro, even though both of them were released with only a few months difference. Xiaomi Redmi Note 10 Pro has a slightly better looking screen than Google Pixel 5, because although it has a little bit lower pixels amount in each inch in the display, it also counts with a little bit larger display and a slightly higher resolution of 1080 x 2400 pixels.
Google Pixel 5 counts with just a little better processing power than Xiaomi Redmi Note 10 Pro, and although they both have the same number of cores, the Google Pixel 5 also has 2 GB more RAM. The Xiaomi Redmi Note 10 Pro has a better memory to install games and applications than Google Pixel 5, because although it has 0 less internal memory, it also counts with a SD card slot that supports a maximum of 512 GB.
Xiaomi Redmi Note 10 Pro features improved battery lifetime than Google Pixel 5, because it has a 23 percent greater battery capacity. Xiaomi Redmi Note 10 Pro shoots better photographs and videos than Google Pixel 5, because although it has lower 30 frames per second video frame rate and a tinier camera aperture which is not nice for taking photographs and/or video in low light situations, and they both have the same 3840x2160 video definition, the Xiaomi Redmi Note 10 Pro also counts with a much better resolution camera.
Although Google Pixel 5 is a better device, it is a lot more expensive than Xiaomi Redmi Note 10 Pro, and it doesn't have such a good quality/price relation as Xiaomi Redmi Note 10 Pro. If you want to save some dollars, you can buy Xiaomi Redmi Note 10 Pro, giving up a couple features and specs, but you'll get the most out of your money.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.