Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 82.4 | 77 |
| Basic Information | |
| Xiaomi | HTC |
| Android 11 | -- |
| 2021-03-24 | 2017-02-21 |
| 6.46 x 3.01 x 0.32 inches | 6.39 x 3.14 x 0.31 inches |
| 6.77 ounces | 6.00 ounces |
| Glacier Blue, Gradient Bronze and Onyx Gray | 16 777 216 |
| Glass | Aluminum and Glass |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 279.00 | $ 749.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 5.7 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) |
| AMOLED | S-LCD 5 |
| 393 pixels per inch | 515 pixels per inch |
| 1200 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 9 | 8.5 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 732G SM7150-AC chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 821 MSM8996 Pro-AB chipset |
| Kryo 470, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor | Kryo, 64-bit (Quad-Core 2150 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 618 GPU | Adreno 530 GPU |
| 9.36 | 8.91 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 11.74 | 14.66 |
| Camera | |
| 108.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| f/1.90 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 0.43 inches (1/2.3") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (120 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 12.1 | 9.9 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5020mAh Battery | 3000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.8 | 4.96 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 4.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Infra-red port | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Xiaomi Redmi Note 10 Pro has a general score of 82.4, which is just a bit better than HTC U Ultra's overall score of 77. The Xiaomi Redmi Note 10 Pro is a notably newer phone than HTC U Ultra, but it is heavier and a bit thicker. Xiaomi Redmi Note 10 Pro counts with a little bit better hardware performance than HTC U Ultra, because it has a higher amount of RAM memory and 4 more processing cores.
The Xiaomi Redmi Note 10 Pro has a little sharper screen than HTC U Ultra, because although it has a little bit lower resolution of 1080 x 2400px and a little less pixels per inch of screen, it also counts with a larger screen. Xiaomi Redmi Note 10 Pro features a way better camera than HTC U Ultra, because although it has a smaller diafragm aperture which is not good for low-light captures, and they both have the same 3840x2160 video resolution and the same 30 fps video frame rate, the Xiaomi Redmi Note 10 Pro also counts with a way better 108 mega-pixels resolution back facing camera.
HTC U Ultra features a superior storage to install games and applications than Xiaomi Redmi Note 10 Pro, and although they both have equal internal memory, the HTC U Ultra also has a slot for SD memory cards that admits a maximum of 1,95 TB. Xiaomi Redmi Note 10 Pro features a superior battery duration than HTC U Ultra, because it has a 5020mAh battery size.
The Xiaomi Redmi Note 10 Pro not only is the best phones of the ones in this comparison, but it's also a bargain compared to the other phones, making it a great choice.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.