Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 82.4 | 87.1 |
| Basic Information | |
| Xiaomi | LG |
| Android 11 | -- |
| 2021-03-24 | 2020-05-15 |
| 6.46 x 3.01 x 0.32 inches | 6.58 x 2.91 x 0.31 inches |
| 6.77 ounces | 6.35 ounces |
| Glacier Blue, Gradient Bronze and Onyx Gray | Aurora gray, Aurora green, Aurora silver, Aurora white and Illusion sunset |
| Glass | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 279.00 | $ 264.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 6.8 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2460 x 1080 pixels |
| AMOLED | P-OLED |
| 393 pixels per inch | 395 pixels per inch |
| 1200 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 9 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 732G SM7150-AC chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G SM7250-AB chipset |
| Kryo 470, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor | Kryo 475, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2400 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 618 GPU | Adreno 620 GPU |
| 9.36 | 9.36 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 11.74 | 17.06 |
| Camera | |
| 108.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| f/1.90 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 12.1 | 11.44 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5020mAh Battery | 4300mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6.8 | 6.16 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Infra-red port | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
LG Velvet has an overall score of 87.1, which is a bit better than Xiaomi Redmi Note 10 Pro's 82.4 score. Even though LG Velvet is older than the Xiaomi Redmi Note 10 Pro, it's body is a bit thinner and a little bit lighter. Xiaomi Redmi Note 10 Pro features a better looking screen than LG Velvet, although it has a bit inferior count of pixels per display inch, a little smaller screen and a bit lower 1080 x 2400 resolution.
LG Velvet's processor is just as good as Xiaomi Redmi Note 10 Pro's processing unit, both of them have the same number of cores and the same RAM amount. The Xiaomi Redmi Note 10 Pro shoots just a bit better photographs and videos than LG Velvet, because although it has a smaller diafragm aperture which is not recommended for low light captures, and they both have the same video frame rates and the same (4K) video definition, the Xiaomi Redmi Note 10 Pro also counts with a lot better 108 MP resolution camera in the back.
LG Velvet features a much bigger storage for games and applications than Xiaomi Redmi Note 10 Pro, because it has 64 GB more internal memory and a SD card slot that allows a maximum of 1,95 TB. Xiaomi Redmi Note 10 Pro has better battery duration than LG Velvet, because it has a 17 percent bigger battery capacity.
In addition to being the best phone between the ones we are comparing, LG Velvet is also the cheapest, making it an easy choice.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.