Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 82.4 | 87.1 |
| Basic Information | |
| Xiaomi | Motorola |
| Android 11 | Android 14 |
| 2021-03-24 | 2024-04-16 |
| 6.46 x 3.01 x 0.32 inches | 6.34 x 2.85 x 0.34 inches |
| 6.77 ounces | 6.95 ounces |
| Glacier Blue, Gradient Bronze and Onyx Gray | Forest Grey (Vegan Leather), Nordic Wood and Peach Fuzz (Vegan Leather) |
| Glass | Aluminum, Vegan Leather and Wood |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 279.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| AMOLED | P-OLED |
| 393 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| 1200 cd/m2 brightness | 2500 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 9 | 9.6 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 732G SM7150-AC chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8s Gen 3 (4 nm) chipset |
| Kryo 470, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor | processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 12 GB RAM |
| Adreno 618 GPU | Adreno 720 GPU |
| 9.36 | 6.21 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 512 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 11.74 | 17.6 |
| Camera | |
| 108.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 50.00 MP + 50.00 MP |
| f/1.90 aperture | f/1.60 aperture |
| -- | 25.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.77 inches (1/1.3") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 12.1 | 12.32 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5020mAh Battery | 4500mAh Nano SIM, eSIM Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6.8 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.4 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Infra-red port | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Motorola Edge 50 Ultra has a score of 87.1, which is slightly better than Xiaomi Redmi Note 10 Pro's 82.4 general score. Both of these devices have Android OS, but the Motorola Edge 50 Ultra has newer 14 version and Xiaomi Redmi Note 10 Pro has Android 11. Motorola Edge 50 Ultra's body is noticeably newer than the Xiaomi Redmi Note 10 Pro's, although it's just a little bit thicker and just a little bit heavier.
Motorola Edge 50 Ultra features a slightly better screen than Xiaomi Redmi Note 10 Pro, and although they both have a screen of the same size, a better pixel quantity per screen inch and the same exact resolution of 1080 x 2400 pixels, the Motorola Edge 50 Ultra also has much more brightness. The Motorola Edge 50 Ultra counts with a superior memory capacity for applications and games than Xiaomi Redmi Note 10 Pro, because although it has no SD memory slot, it also counts with 512 GB internal storage capacity.
Xiaomi Redmi Note 10 Pro features a much more powerful processing unit than Motorola Edge 50 Ultra, although it has a lower amount of RAM, they both have 8 CPU cores. The Motorola Edge 50 Ultra counts with a little bit better camera than Xiaomi Redmi Note 10 Pro, because although it has a lower video quality and a much worse resolution back camera, it also counts with a bigger aperture to take better low light images.
Xiaomi Redmi Note 10 Pro counts with a little longer battery duration than Motorola Edge 50 Ultra, because it has 5020mAh of battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.