Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 82.4 | 86.2 |
| Basic Information | |
| Xiaomi | Motorola |
| Android 11 | Android 11 |
| 2021-03-24 | 2021-11-18 |
| 6.46 x 3.01 x 0.32 inches | 6.62 x 2.97 x 0.35 inches |
| 6.77 ounces | 7.13 ounces |
| Glacier Blue, Gradient Bronze and Onyx Gray | Glacier Green and Stellar Blue |
| Glass | Glass |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 279.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 6.8 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2460 x 1080 pixels |
| AMOLED | IPS LCD |
| 393 pixels per inch | 395 pixels per inch |
| 1200 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 9 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 732G SM7150-AC chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 888+ SM8350-AC chipset |
| Kryo 470, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor | Kryo 680, 64-bit, 5 nm (Octa-Core 3000 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Adreno 618 GPU | Adreno 660 GPU |
| 9.36 | 9.72 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 11.74 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 108.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 108.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| f/1.90 aperture | f/1.90 aperture |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 12.1 | 11.88 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5020mAh Battery | 5000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.8 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | -- |
| Infra-red port | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Motorola Moto G200 5G is a little bit better than the Xiaomi Redmi Note 10 Pro, having an 86.2 score against 82.4. Even being the best in this review, it must be told that it's also a a little bit thicker and a bit heavier cellphone. Both of these phones use the same Android 11 OS (Operating System), so you shouldn't see any differences regarding operating system features.
Xiaomi Redmi Note 10 Pro has a much better display than Motorola Moto G200 5G, although it has a just a little lower display pixel density, a little bit smaller screen and a little worse 1080 x 2400 resolution. The Xiaomi Redmi Note 10 Pro features a bigger storage capacity for applications and games than Motorola Moto G200 5G, because although it has just 64 GB internal storage capacity, it also counts with an external SD slot that allows a maximum of 512 GB.
Motorola Moto G200 5G has a bit faster processor than Xiaomi Redmi Note 10 Pro, and although they both have 8 cores, the Motorola Moto G200 5G also has a greater amount of RAM memory. The Xiaomi Redmi Note 10 Pro counts with a slightly better camera than Motorola Moto G200 5G. Both of them have the same aperture, a same resolution back-facing camera, the same 3840x2160 (4K) video quality and the same video frame rates.
Moto G200 5G's battery life is very similar to the Xiaomi Redmi Note 10 Pro one, although the Moto G200 5G has just 5000mAh of battery capacity instead of 5020mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.