Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 82.4 | 76.4 |
| Basic Information | |
| Xiaomi | Nokia |
| Android 11 | -- |
| 2021-03-24 | 2019-03-03 |
| 6.46 x 3.01 x 0.32 inches | 6.10 x 2.95 x 0.31 inches |
| 6.77 ounces | 6.07 ounces |
| Glacier Blue, Gradient Bronze and Onyx Gray | Blue |
| Glass | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 279.00 | $ 699.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 6 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2880 x 1440 pixels |
| AMOLED | P-OLED |
| 393 pixels per inch | 537 pixels per inch |
| 1200 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 9 | 8.8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 732G SM7150-AC chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 SDM845 chipset |
| Kryo 470, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor | Kryo 385, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2800 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 618 GPU | Adreno 630 GPU |
| 9.36 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 11.74 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 108.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 20.00 MP |
| f/1.90 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 28.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.36 inches (1/2.8") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 12.1 | 9.68 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5020mAh Battery | 3320mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6.8 | 5.28 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Infra-red port | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Xiaomi Redmi Note 10 Pro is a little bit better than Nokia 9 PureView, getting a global score of 82.4 against 76.4. Although Xiaomi Redmi Note 10 Pro is incredibly newer than the Nokia 9 PureView, it's a little bit thicker and heavier. Nokia 9 PureView has just a bit better hardware performance than Xiaomi Redmi Note 10 Pro. Both of them have a 6 GB RAM and a Octa-Core processor.
Xiaomi Redmi Note 10 Pro counts with a little more vivid display than Nokia 9 PureView, because although it has a way worse resolution of 1080 x 2400px and a way lower pixels density, it also counts with a quite larger screen. Xiaomi Redmi Note 10 Pro has a way better camera than Nokia 9 PureView, because although it has a smaller aperture which is not favorable for low-light captures and video, and they both have the same 30 frames per second video frame rates and the same 3840x2160 video resolution, the Xiaomi Redmi Note 10 Pro also counts with a lot more MP back facing camera.
The Xiaomi Redmi Note 10 Pro counts with a better storage for games and applications than Nokia 9 PureView, because although it has less internal memory capacity, it also counts with a slot for SD memory cards that admits up to 512 GB. The Xiaomi Redmi Note 10 Pro counts with a much longer battery life than Nokia 9 PureView, because it has 5020mAh of battery capacity.
Even being the best phone of the ones in this comparison, the Xiaomi Redmi Note 10 Pro is also by far the cheapest one.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.