Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 82.4 | 79.9 |
| Basic Information | |
| Xiaomi | Samsung |
| Android 11 | Android 14 |
| 2021-03-24 | 2023-12-11 |
| 6.46 x 3.01 x 0.32 inches | 6.34 x 3.01 x 0.33 inches |
| 6.77 ounces | 6.95 ounces |
| Glacier Blue, Gradient Bronze and Onyx Gray | Brave Black, Fantasy Blue, Optimistic Blue and Personality Yellow |
| Glass | Plastic and Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 279.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 6.5 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| AMOLED | Super AMOLED |
| 393 pixels per inch | 396 pixels per inch |
| 1200 cd/m2 brightness | 1000 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 9 | 8.8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 732G SM7150-AC chipset | Exynos 1280 (5 nm) chipset |
| Kryo 470, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor | processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 618 GPU | Mali-G68 GPU |
| 9.36 | 6.12 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot |
| 11.74 | 15.42 |
| Camera | |
| 108.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 50.00 MP + 13.00 MP |
| f/1.90 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 27.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.36 inches (1/2.76") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 12.1 | 11.11 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G) and LTE (4G) |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 9.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5020mAh Battery | 5000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.8 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.3 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Infra-red port | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Xiaomi Redmi Note 10 Pro has a general score of 82.4, which is slightly better than Galaxy A25 5G's 79.9 general score. These phones have Android operating system, but Xiaomi Redmi Note 10 Pro has the previous 11 version and Galaxy A25 5G has Android 14 version. Despite of the fact that Xiaomi Redmi Note 10 Pro is older than the Galaxy A25 5G, it's design is just a little bit lighter and just a little thinner.
The Xiaomi Redmi Note 10 Pro features a little sharper display than Samsung Galaxy A25 5G, because although it has a just a little inferior amount of pixels per inch in the display, it also counts with a bit higher resolution of 1080 x 2400, a little bit larger screen and a little brighter screen. Samsung Galaxy A25 5G features a superior storage to store more apps and games than Xiaomi Redmi Note 10 Pro, because it has more internal memory and an external memory slot that admits a maximum of 1 TB.
The Xiaomi Redmi Note 10 Pro has a much better performing processor than Galaxy A25 5G. Both of them have the same number of cores and 6 GB of RAM. Xiaomi Redmi Note 10 Pro has a little bit better camera than Galaxy A25 5G, because although it has a tinier camera aperture which is not good for taking images and videos in low light environments, and they both have the same 30 fps video frame rate and the same video resolution, the Xiaomi Redmi Note 10 Pro also counts with a camera in the back with a way better resolution.
Xiaomi Redmi Note 10 Pro and Galaxy A25 5G have quite similar battery performance, although the Galaxy A25 5G has 5000mAh of battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.