Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 82.4 | 83.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| Xiaomi | Samsung |
| Android 11 | -- |
| 2021-03-24 | 2019-03-15 |
| 6.46 x 3.01 x 0.32 inches | 6.24 x 2.93 x 0.30 inches |
| 6.77 ounces | 5.86 ounces |
| Glacier Blue, Gradient Bronze and Onyx Gray | Black, Blue, Coral and White |
| Glass | Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 279.00 | $ 202.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 6.4 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| AMOLED | Super AMOLED |
| 393 pixels per inch | 403 pixels per inch |
| 1200 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 9 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 732G SM7150-AC chipset | Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 9610 chipset |
| Kryo 470, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor | ARM Cortex-A73 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 618 GPU | Mali-G72 MP3 GPU |
| 9.36 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 11.74 | 14.14 |
| Camera | |
| 108.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 25.00 MP + 25.00 MP |
| f/1.90 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| -- | 27.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.36 inches (1/2.8") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 12.1 | 10.12 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5020mAh Battery | 4000mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.8 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Infra-red port | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Galaxy A50 is just a bit better than Xiaomi Redmi Note 10 Pro, getting an 83.8 score against 82.4. Galaxy A50 is an extremely older phone than the Xiaomi Redmi Note 10 Pro, but Samsung was able to make it lighter and just a bit thinner anyway. The Xiaomi Redmi Note 10 Pro counts with a much better display than Galaxy A50, because although it has a just a little lower count of pixels per screen inch, it also counts with a slightly better 1080 x 2400px resolution and a bit bigger display.
Xiaomi Redmi Note 10 Pro counts with a bit faster processing unit than Galaxy A50, and although they both have 8 processing cores, the Xiaomi Redmi Note 10 Pro also has more RAM memory. The Xiaomi Redmi Note 10 Pro counts with a better camera than Galaxy A50, because although it has a tinier diafragm aperture which is worse for low light images and videos, it also counts with a lot better 108 MP resolution camera and a way higher (4K) video resolution.
The Galaxy A50 has a lot bigger storage capacity to store more apps and games than Xiaomi Redmi Note 10 Pro, and although they both have a slot for external memory cards that admits a maximum of 512 GB, the Galaxy A50 also has more internal storage capacity. Xiaomi Redmi Note 10 Pro counts with improved battery life than Samsung Galaxy A50, because it has a 26% bigger battery size.
In addition to being the best phone in our current comparison, Galaxy A50 is also a lot cheaper, which makes it a great choice.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.