Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 82.4 | 86.6 |
| Basic Information | |
| Xiaomi | Samsung |
| Android 11 | Android 10, 9.0 Pie |
| 2021-03-24 | 2019-10-20 |
| 6.46 x 3.01 x 0.32 inches | 6.24 x 2.93 x 0.30 inches |
| 6.77 ounces | 5.86 ounces |
| Glacier Blue, Gradient Bronze and Onyx Gray | Prism crush black, Prism crush green, Prism crush violet and Prism crush white |
| Glass | Plastic and Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 279.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 6.4 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| AMOLED | Super AMOLED |
| 393 pixels per inch | 403 pixels per inch |
| 1200 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 9 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 732G SM7150-AC chipset | Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 9610 chipset |
| Kryo 470, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor | ARM Cortex-A73 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 618 GPU | Mali-G72 MP3 GPU |
| 9.36 | 9.36 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 11.74 | 14.14 |
| Camera | |
| 108.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.90 aperture | f/2.00 aperture |
| -- | 13.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 12.1 | 11.55 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5020mAh Battery | 4000mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.8 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Infra-red port | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Samsung Galaxy A50s is a bit better than the Xiaomi Redmi Note 10 Pro, having a general score of 86.6 against 82.4. Both of these devices come with Android OS, but the Samsung Galaxy A50s has 10 version while Xiaomi Redmi Note 10 Pro has Android 11. Samsung Galaxy A50s's construction is just a little bit thinner and lighter than the Xiaomi Redmi Note 10 Pro, even though it was released a bit more over a year before.
The Samsung Galaxy A50s's processing unit is just as good as Xiaomi Redmi Note 10 Pro's CPU, both of them have a Octa-Core CPU and the same RAM amount. The Xiaomi Redmi Note 10 Pro has a sharper display than Galaxy A50s, because although it has a just a little worse display density, it also counts with a quite bigger display and a bit higher 1080 x 2400 resolution.
Xiaomi Redmi Note 10 Pro takes a bit better pictures and videos than Galaxy A50s, and although they both have the same video quality and the same 30 frames per second video frame rates, the Xiaomi Redmi Note 10 Pro also has a larger aperture and a back camera with a way higher resolution. The Samsung Galaxy A50s features a way bigger storage to install applications and games than Xiaomi Redmi Note 10 Pro, and although they both have a SD card slot that supports a maximum of 512 GB, the Samsung Galaxy A50s also has 128 GB internal memory capacity.
The Xiaomi Redmi Note 10 Pro has superior battery lifetime than Galaxy A50s, because it has a 5020mAh battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.