Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 82.4 | 85.5 |
| Basic Information | |
| Xiaomi | Samsung |
| Android 11 | Android 11, 10 |
| 2021-03-24 | 2019-12-27 |
| 6.46 x 3.01 x 0.32 inches | 6.24 x 2.90 x 0.31 inches |
| 6.77 ounces | 6.07 ounces |
| Glacier Blue, Gradient Bronze and Onyx Gray | Prism Crush black, Prism Crush blue, Prism Crush pink and Prism Crush white |
| Glass | Plastic and Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 279.00 | $ 282.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 6.5 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| AMOLED | Super AMOLED |
| 393 pixels per inch | 405 pixels per inch |
| 1200 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 9 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 732G SM7150-AC chipset | Samsung Exynos 9611 chipset |
| Kryo 470, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor | ARM Cortex-A73 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 618 GPU | Mali-G72 MP3 GPU |
| 9.36 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 11.74 | 14.14 |
| Camera | |
| 108.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.90 aperture | f/2.00 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 12.1 | 11.55 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5020mAh Battery | 4000mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.8 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Infra-red port | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Samsung Galaxy A51 is a bit better than Xiaomi Redmi Note 10 Pro, with an 85.5 score against 82.4. The Samsung Galaxy A51 is an older phone than Xiaomi Redmi Note 10 Pro, but Samsung made it just a little bit thinner and somewhat lighter anyway. Both of these devices use the same Android 11 operating system, so you shouldn't notice any differences regarding OS features.
The Xiaomi Redmi Note 10 Pro counts with a more vivid screen than Galaxy A51, because although it has a little bit worse pixel density, and they both have the same 1080 x 2400 pixels resolution, the Xiaomi Redmi Note 10 Pro also counts with a bit bigger screen. The Xiaomi Redmi Note 10 Pro features a little better hardware performance than Galaxy A51, and although they both have a Octa-Core processor, the Xiaomi Redmi Note 10 Pro also has a greater amount of RAM.
Xiaomi Redmi Note 10 Pro counts with just a bit better camera than Samsung Galaxy A51, and although they both have the same video frame rate and the same 3840x2160 video quality, the Xiaomi Redmi Note 10 Pro also has a larger aperture and a way more mega-pixels back facing camera. The Samsung Galaxy A51 features a lot bigger memory capacity for applications and games than Xiaomi Redmi Note 10 Pro, and although they both have an external memory card slot that holds a maximum of 512 GB, the Samsung Galaxy A51 also has 128 GB internal storage.
Xiaomi Redmi Note 10 Pro features better battery duration than Samsung Galaxy A51, because it has a 26% larger battery capacity.
The Samsung Galaxy A51 costs a little more money than Xiaomi Redmi Note 10 Pro, but it's still a convenient choice, because you can get a much better phone for that extra money.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.