Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 82.4 | 90.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| Xiaomi | Samsung |
| Android 11 | Android 11, 10 |
| 2021-03-24 | 2020-04-29 |
| 6.46 x 3.01 x 0.32 inches | 6.26 x 2.90 x 0.34 inches |
| 6.77 ounces | 6.60 ounces |
| Glacier Blue, Gradient Bronze and Onyx Gray | Prism cube black |
| Glass | Aluminum and Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 279.00 | $ 339.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 6.5 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| AMOLED | Super AMOLED |
| 393 pixels per inch | 405 pixels per inch |
| 1200 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 9 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 732G SM7150-AC chipset | Samsung Exynos 980 chipset |
| Kryo 470, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor | ARM Cortex-A77 and ARM Cortex-A55, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 618 GPU | Mali-G76 MP5 GPU |
| 9.36 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot |
| 11.74 | 15.38 |
| Camera | |
| 108.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.90 aperture | f/2.00 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (480 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 12.1 | 11.55 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5020mAh Battery | 4500mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.8 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Infra-red port | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Galaxy A51 5G is much better than the Xiaomi Redmi Note 10 Pro, having a general score of 90.8 against 82.4. Both devices in this review have the same Android 11 OS (operating system), so they should provide very similar OS features. Despite of the fact Galaxy A51 5G is older and just a little thicker than Xiaomi Redmi Note 10 Pro, it's body is still just a little bit lighter.
Xiaomi Redmi Note 10 Pro counts with a little bit better hardware performance than Galaxy A51 5G. They have 8 cores and 6 GB of RAM. Xiaomi Redmi Note 10 Pro counts with a more vivid screen than Samsung Galaxy A51 5G, because although it has a just a bit lower display pixels density, and they both have the same exact 1080 x 2400 resolution, the Xiaomi Redmi Note 10 Pro also counts with a quite larger display.
Xiaomi Redmi Note 10 Pro counts with a bit better camera than Samsung Galaxy A51 5G, and although they both have the same (4K) video quality and the same 30 frames per second video frame rates, the Xiaomi Redmi Note 10 Pro also has a bigger aperture to capture better low light photos and video and a way more MP camera in the back.
Galaxy A51 5G has a way bigger memory to install applications and games or saving photos and videos than Xiaomi Redmi Note 10 Pro, because it has an external memory card slot that allows a maximum of 1000 GB and 64 GB more internal memory. The Xiaomi Redmi Note 10 Pro has a bit superior battery duration than Galaxy A51 5G, because it has a 12% greater battery size.
Galaxy A51 5G costs more than Xiaomi Redmi Note 10 Pro, but it's still a convenient choice, because you can get a lot more features for that extra money.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.