Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 82.4 | 90.7 |
| Basic Information | |
| Xiaomi | Samsung |
| Android 11 | -- |
| 2021-03-24 | 2021-03-17 |
| 6.46 x 3.01 x 0.32 inches | 6.30 x 2.96 x 0.33 inches |
| 6.77 ounces | 6.67 ounces |
| Glacier Blue, Gradient Bronze and Onyx Gray | -- |
| Glass | Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 279.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 6.5 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| AMOLED | Super AMOLED |
| 393 pixels per inch | 405 pixels per inch |
| 1200 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 9 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 732G SM7150-AC chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 750G SM7225 chipset |
| Kryo 470, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor | Kryo 570, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 618 GPU | Adreno 619 GPU |
| 9.36 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot |
| 11.74 | 15.42 |
| Camera | |
| 108.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.90 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 12.1 | 12.1 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5020mAh Battery | 4500mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.8 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Infra-red port | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Galaxy A52 has a score of 90.7, which is much better than the Xiaomi Redmi Note 10 Pro's global score of 82.4. Even though the Galaxy A52 and the Xiaomi Redmi Note 10 Pro were released with only a couple months difference, Galaxy A52's body is just a little lighter but also a bit thicker than the Xiaomi Redmi Note 10 Pro.
Xiaomi Redmi Note 10 Pro features a much better screen than Samsung Galaxy A52, because although it has a quite worse pixel density, and they both have the same exact resolution of 1080 x 2400, the Xiaomi Redmi Note 10 Pro also counts with a bit bigger screen. The Xiaomi Redmi Note 10 Pro features a bit superior CPU than Galaxy A52. They have 6 GB of RAM and 8 processing cores.
Galaxy A52's camera is very similar to the Xiaomi Redmi Note 10 Pro one, because although the Galaxy A52 has a camera in the back with lot less MP and a worse 3840x2160 video definition, it also counts with a bigger aperture to capture better images in poorly lited situations. The Galaxy A52 features a very superior memory for games and applications than Xiaomi Redmi Note 10 Pro, because it has a SD extension slot that allows a maximum of 1 TB and 64 GB more internal storage capacity.
The Xiaomi Redmi Note 10 Pro features a little better battery performance than Galaxy A52, because it has 5020mAh of battery capacity against 4500mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.