Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 82.4 | 91.3 |
| Basic Information | |
| Xiaomi | Samsung |
| Android 11 | Android 12, 11 |
| 2021-03-24 | 2021-03-19 |
| 6.46 x 3.01 x 0.32 inches | 6.30 x 2.96 x 0.33 inches |
| 6.77 ounces | 6.67 ounces |
| Glacier Blue, Gradient Bronze and Onyx Gray | -- |
| Glass | Plastic and Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 279.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 6.5 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| AMOLED | Super AMOLED |
| 393 pixels per inch | 405 pixels per inch |
| 1200 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 9 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 732G SM7150-AC chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 750G SM7225 (8 nm) chipset |
| Kryo 470, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor | Kryo 570, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 618 GPU | Adreno 619 GPU |
| 9.36 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot |
| 11.74 | 15.42 |
| Camera | |
| 108.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.90 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 12.1 | 12.1 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5020mAh Battery | 4500mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.8 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Infra-red port | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Galaxy A52 5G has an overall score of 91.3, which is better than the Xiaomi Redmi Note 10 Pro's global score of 82.4. These phones include Android OS (Operating System), but the Galaxy A52 5G has the newer 12 version while Xiaomi Redmi Note 10 Pro has Android 11 version. Although Galaxy A52 5G and the Xiaomi Redmi Note 10 Pro were only released 0 months apart, Galaxy A52 5G's body is a little lighter but just a little thicker than the Xiaomi Redmi Note 10 Pro.
Xiaomi Redmi Note 10 Pro features a brighter display than Samsung Galaxy A52 5G, because although it has a little inferior number of pixels per inch of display, and they both have an equal 1080 x 2400 pixels resolution, the Xiaomi Redmi Note 10 Pro also counts with a little bit bigger screen. Xiaomi Redmi Note 10 Pro has just a little better processing power than Samsung Galaxy A52 5G. Both have the same RAM amount and the same number of cores.
Galaxy A52 5G counts with a much bigger storage capacity for apps and games than Xiaomi Redmi Note 10 Pro, because it has 128 GB internal memory capacity and a SD extension slot that admits a maximum of 1 TB. The Samsung Galaxy A52 5G has a camera that is just as good as the camera in Xiaomi Redmi Note 10 Pro, because although the Samsung Galaxy A52 5G has a lower video resolution and a lot lower 64 mega pixels resolution back-facing camera, it also counts with a larger aperture for better low-light captures.
The Xiaomi Redmi Note 10 Pro counts with a bit longer battery performance than Samsung Galaxy A52 5G, because it has a 12% more battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.