Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 82.4 | 91.1 |
| Basic Information | |
| Xiaomi | Samsung |
| Android 11 | Android 11 |
| 2021-03-24 | 2021-09-01 |
| 6.46 x 3.01 x 0.32 inches | 6.30 x 2.96 x 0.33 inches |
| 6.77 ounces | 6.67 ounces |
| Glacier Blue, Gradient Bronze and Onyx Gray | Awesome Black, Awesome Mint, Awesome Violet and Awesome White |
| Glass | Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 279.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 6.5 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| AMOLED | Super AMOLED |
| 393 pixels per inch | 405 pixels per inch |
| 1200 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 9 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 732G SM7150-AC chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G SM7325 (6 nm) chipset |
| Kryo 470, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor | Kryo 670, 64-bit (Octa-Core 2400 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 618 GPU | Adreno 642L GPU |
| 9.36 | 9.36 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot |
| 11.74 | 15.42 |
| Camera | |
| 108.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.90 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 12.1 | 12.1 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5020mAh Battery | 4500mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.8 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Infra-red port | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Galaxy A52s is better than the Xiaomi Redmi Note 10 Pro, having a overall score of 91.1 against 82.4. The Galaxy A52s construction is a little bit thicker but a little lighter than the Xiaomi Redmi Note 10 Pro, and both were only released with a couple months difference. Both of these phones have the same Android 11 operating system, so both of them should provide the user the same OS features.
The Xiaomi Redmi Note 10 Pro counts with a much better looking screen than Galaxy A52s, because although it has a little inferior pixels amount in each inch of display, and they both have an equal resolution of 1080 x 2400px, the Xiaomi Redmi Note 10 Pro also counts with a bit larger display. Samsung Galaxy A52s features a CPU that is just as good as the Xiaomi Redmi Note 10 Pro one, they have 6 GB of RAM and the same number of cores.
The Samsung Galaxy A52s and Xiaomi Redmi Note 10 Pro have very similar cameras, because although the Samsung Galaxy A52s has a camera with much less MP resolution and a worse 3840x2160 (4K) video quality, it also counts with a bigger aperture to take better low light photos. Galaxy A52s counts with a much bigger memory to install applications and games or saving photos and videos than Xiaomi Redmi Note 10 Pro, because it has a SD extension slot that allows up to 1 TB and 128 GB internal storage.
The Xiaomi Redmi Note 10 Pro has just a little bit longer battery lifetime than Galaxy A52s, because it has a 12% more battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.