Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 82.4 | 76.9 |
| Basic Information | |
| Xiaomi | Samsung |
| Android 11 | Android 10, 9.0 Pie |
| 2021-03-24 | 2019-04-26 |
| 6.46 x 3.01 x 0.32 inches | 6.47 x 3.02 x 0.31 inches |
| 6.77 ounces | 6.46 ounces |
| Glacier Blue, Gradient Bronze and Onyx Gray | Black, Blue, Pink and White |
| Glass | Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 279.00 | $ 299.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| AMOLED | Super AMOLED |
| 393 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| 1200 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 9 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 732G SM7150-AC chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 675 SM6150 chipset |
| Kryo 470, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor | Kryo 460, 64-bit, 11 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 618 GPU | Adreno 612 GPU |
| 9.36 | 9.18 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 11.74 | 14.14 |
| Camera | |
| 108.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 32.00 MP |
| f/1.90 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| -- | 27.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.36 inches (1/2.8") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 12.1 | 3.52 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5020mAh Battery | 4500mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.8 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Infra-red port | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Xiaomi Redmi Note 10 Pro has a score of 82.4, which is a bit better than the Samsung Galaxy A70's global score of 76.9. The Xiaomi Redmi Note 10 Pro construction is newer, but a little thicker and just a little bit heavier than Samsung Galaxy A70. Both of these phones include Android OS, but Xiaomi Redmi Note 10 Pro has newer 11 version and Samsung Galaxy A70 has Android 10 version, so it provides you a couple nice extra features and enhanced performance.
The Xiaomi Redmi Note 10 Pro counts with a little bit better processing power than Galaxy A70. Both have a Octa-Core processing unit and the same RAM memory amount. Xiaomi Redmi Note 10 Pro has a better screen than Galaxy A70. Both of them have the same amount of pixels per inch of screen, a display with the same size and the same exact 1080 x 2400 pixels resolution.
The Samsung Galaxy A70 has a very superior storage capacity for games and applications than Xiaomi Redmi Note 10 Pro, and although they both have a SD card slot that supports a maximum of 512 GB, the Samsung Galaxy A70 also has more internal storage capacity. The Xiaomi Redmi Note 10 Pro has a bit superior battery life than Galaxy A70, because it has a 5020mAh battery size.
Xiaomi Redmi Note 10 Pro has a very superior camera than Samsung Galaxy A70, although it has a smaller camera aperture, they both have the same 3840x2160 (4K) video quality and the same 30 frames per second video frame rates.
In addition to being the best phone of the ones in this comparison, Xiaomi Redmi Note 10 Pro is also a bit cheaper.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.