Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 82.4 | 85.2 |
| Basic Information | |
| Xiaomi | Samsung |
| Android 11 | -- |
| 2021-03-24 | 2018-11-15 |
| 6.46 x 3.01 x 0.32 inches | 6.40 x 3.03 x 0.31 inches |
| 6.77 ounces | 6.46 ounces |
| Glacier Blue, Gradient Bronze and Onyx Gray | Bubblegum pink, Caviar black and Lemonade blue |
| Glass | Glass and Metal |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 279.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 6.3 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2220 x 1080 pixels |
| AMOLED | Super AMOLED |
| 393 pixels per inch | 392 pixels per inch |
| 1200 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 9 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 732G SM7150-AC chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 660 SDM660 chipset |
| Kryo 470, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor | Kryo 260, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 618 GPU | Adreno 512 GPU |
| 9.36 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 11.74 | 14.14 |
| Camera | |
| 108.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 24.00 MP + 24.00 MP |
| f/1.90 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| -- | 27.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.36 inches (1/2.8") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 12.1 | 10.45 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5020mAh Battery | 3800mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.8 | 5.76 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Infra-red port | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Samsung Galaxy A9 (2018) is slightly better than the Xiaomi Redmi Note 10 Pro, having an 85.2 score against 82.4. The Samsung Galaxy A9 (2018) body is a bit lighter and a bit thinner than Xiaomi Redmi Note 10 Pro, even though it was released 2 years before. Xiaomi Redmi Note 10 Pro counts with a bit more powerful processing unit than Galaxy A9 (2018). Both have 6 GB of RAM and a Octa-Core processor.
Xiaomi Redmi Note 10 Pro counts with a much better screen than Galaxy A9 (2018), because it has a slightly better resolution of 1080 x 2400px, a bit bigger screen and a just a little higher pixels density. The Galaxy A9 (2018) counts with a much bigger storage to install games and applications than Xiaomi Redmi Note 10 Pro, and although they both have a SD extension slot that holds up to 512 GB, the Galaxy A9 (2018) also has 128 GB internal storage.
Xiaomi Redmi Note 10 Pro shoots much better videos and photos than Galaxy A9 (2018), because although it has a tinier camera aperture which is not so good for low light photography and video, and they both have the same 3840x2160 video resolution and the same 30 fps video frame rate, the Xiaomi Redmi Note 10 Pro also counts with a lot more MP back facing camera.
The Xiaomi Redmi Note 10 Pro features longer battery life than Galaxy A9 (2018), because it has 5020mAh of battery capacity instead of 3800mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.