Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 82.4 | 79.3 |
| Basic Information | |
| Xiaomi | Samsung |
| Android 11 | Android 5.1 |
| 2021-03-24 | 2015-08-13 |
| 6.46 x 3.01 x 0.32 inches | 6.03 x 3.00 x 0.30 inches |
| 6.77 ounces | 6.03 ounces |
| Glacier Blue, Gradient Bronze and Onyx Gray | Black, Gold, Gray and White |
| Glass | Glass; metal |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 279.00 | $ 415.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 5.7 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 1440 x 2560 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) |
| AMOLED | Super AMOLED |
| 393 pixels per inch | 515 pixels per inch |
| 1200 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | Capacitive, Multi-touch |
| 9 | 9.4 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 732G SM7150-AC chipset | Exynos 7 Octa 7420 chipset |
| Kryo 470, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor | ARM Cortex-A57 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit (Single-Core 2100 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 618 GPU | ARM Mali-T760 MP8 GPU |
| 9.36 | 8.46 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 11.74 | 7.7 |
| Camera | |
| 108.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 16.00 MP + 5.00 MP |
| f/1.90 aperture | f/1.90 aperture |
| -- | 28.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.38 inches (1/2.6") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 2560 x 1440 (60 fps) (Quad HD / 2K) slow motion video |
| 12.1 | 10.01 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), HSPA, HSUPA, EDGE, GPRS, GSM and CDMA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.8 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5020mAh Battery | 3000mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| -- | 336 hours standby time 22 hours talk time |
| 6.8 | 4.96 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 4.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Infra-red port | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | -- |
| Accelerometer, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Xiaomi Redmi Note 10 Pro has a general score of 82.4, which is a bit better than the Galaxy Note 5's 79.3 overall score. These devices have Android OS, but the Xiaomi Redmi Note 10 Pro has the newer 11 version while Galaxy Note 5 has Android 5.1. The Xiaomi Redmi Note 10 Pro is a incredibly newer phone than Galaxy Note 5, although it's just a bit thicker and heavier.
The Xiaomi Redmi Note 10 Pro has a greater hardware performance than Samsung Galaxy Note 5, because it has a greater number of faster cores and a higher amount of RAM memory. The Galaxy Note 5 features a bit better display than Xiaomi Redmi Note 10 Pro, because although it has a quite smaller screen, it also counts with a better resolution of 2560 x 1440 and a higher quantity of pixels per display inch.
The Xiaomi Redmi Note 10 Pro captures greater pictures and videos than Galaxy Note 5, and although they both have the same video frame rate, a F1.9 aperture and the same 3840x2160 video definition, the Xiaomi Redmi Note 10 Pro also has a back-facing camera with a much higher resolution. The Xiaomi Redmi Note 10 Pro features a much bigger storage capacity for applications, games, photos and videos than Galaxy Note 5, and although they both have the same 64 GB internal memory capacity, the Xiaomi Redmi Note 10 Pro also has a SD extension slot that supports up to 512 GB.
Xiaomi Redmi Note 10 Pro features a very superior battery lifetime than Galaxy Note 5, because it has a 5020mAh battery size against 3000mAh.
Despite of being the best phone of the ones we are comparing, the Xiaomi Redmi Note 10 Pro is also very cheap compared to the other ones, making it a great choice.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.