Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 82.4 | 80.4 |
| Basic Information | |
| Xiaomi | Samsung |
| Android 11 | -- |
| 2021-03-24 | 2017-07-07 |
| 6.46 x 3.01 x 0.32 inches | 6.04 x 2.91 x 0.31 inches |
| 6.77 ounces | 5.89 ounces |
| Glacier Blue, Gradient Bronze and Onyx Gray | Black, Blue, Gold and Silver |
| Glass | -- |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 279.00 | $ 611.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 5.7 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) |
| AMOLED | Super AMOLED |
| 393 pixels per inch | 515 pixels per inch |
| 1200 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 9 | 8.6 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 732G SM7150-AC chipset | Samsung Exynos 8 Octa 8890 chipset |
| Kryo 470, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor | Exynos M1and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 618 GPU | Mali-T880 MP12 GPU |
| 9.36 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 256 GB) external memory slot |
| 11.74 | 10.78 |
| Camera | |
| 108.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 5.00 MP |
| f/1.90 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.4 inches (1/2.5") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 12.1 | 9.57 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G) and HSPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.1 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5020mAh Battery | 3200mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6.8 | 5.2 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 4.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Infra-red port | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Xiaomi Redmi Note 10 Pro is slightly better than the Galaxy Note Fan Edition, having a general score of 82.4 against 80.4. The Xiaomi Redmi Note 10 Pro design is much newer, but just a bit thicker and somewhat heavier than Galaxy Note Fan Edition. Xiaomi Redmi Note 10 Pro has a little more vivid screen than Samsung Galaxy Note Fan Edition, because although it has a quite lower resolution of 1080 x 2400 pixels and a just a bit lower screen pixels density, it also counts with a bigger display.
The Xiaomi Redmi Note 10 Pro has a little bit better storage capacity to store more apps and games than Galaxy Note Fan Edition, and although they both have the same 64 GB internal memory, the Xiaomi Redmi Note 10 Pro also has a SD extension slot that supports up to 512 GB. Xiaomi Redmi Note 10 Pro counts with just a bit better performance than Samsung Galaxy Note Fan Edition, and although they both have 8 cpu cores, the Xiaomi Redmi Note 10 Pro also has 2 GB more RAM.
Xiaomi Redmi Note 10 Pro has a much better battery lifetime than Samsung Galaxy Note Fan Edition, because it has a 57% more battery capacity. Xiaomi Redmi Note 10 Pro takes much better pictures and videos than Galaxy Note Fan Edition, because although it has a smaller camera aperture which is not recommended for capturing images in low light situations, and they both have the same (4K) video resolution and the same 30 fps video frame rates, the Xiaomi Redmi Note 10 Pro also counts with a back camera with a much higher 108 megapixels resolution.
In addition to being the best phone in our comparison, Xiaomi Redmi Note 10 Pro is also very cheap compared to the other ones, making it a no doubt choice.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.