Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 82.4 | 90.7 |
| Basic Information | |
| Xiaomi | Samsung |
| Android 11 | Android 14 |
| 2021-03-24 | -- |
| 6.46 x 3.01 x 0.32 inches | -- |
| 6.77 ounces | -- |
| Glacier Blue, Gradient Bronze and Onyx Gray | -- |
| Glass | Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass) and Titanium |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 279.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 6.8 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 3088 x 1440 pixels |
| AMOLED | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 393 pixels per inch | 501 pixels per inch |
| 1200 cd/m2 brightness | 2600 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 9 | 10.2 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 732G SM7150-AC chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 4 chipset |
| Kryo 470, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor | processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 12 GB RAM |
| Adreno 618 GPU | Yes GPU |
| 9.36 | 6.21 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 11.74 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 108.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 200.00 MP + 12.00 MP |
| f/1.90 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| -- | 24.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.77 inches (1/1.3") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 7680 x 4320 (30 fps) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 12.1 | 14.74 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5020mAh Battery | 5000mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6.8 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.3 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Infra-red port | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Galaxy S25 Ultra has a general score of 90.7, which is much better than the Xiaomi Redmi Note 10 Pro's global score of 82.4. Both of these devices come with Android OS (operating system), but the Galaxy S25 Ultra has a newer 14 version and Xiaomi Redmi Note 10 Pro has Android 11 version, so it provides the user some nice extra features. Galaxy S25 Ultra's design is notably lighter and extremely thinner than Xiaomi Redmi Note 10 Pro.
Xiaomi Redmi Note 10 Pro features an extremely better processor than Galaxy S25 Ultra, although it has lesser RAM memory, they both have the same number of cores. Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra counts with a more vivid display than Xiaomi Redmi Note 10 Pro, because it has a bit bigger display, a better pixel density, a better resolution of 1440 x 3088 pixels and way more brightness.
The Galaxy S25 Ultra captures a lot better pictures and videos than Xiaomi Redmi Note 10 Pro, because it has a much better video definition, a camera in the back with a much better 200 megapixels resolution and a larger camera aperture to capture better low-light captures. The Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra counts with a quite bigger memory for games and applications than Xiaomi Redmi Note 10 Pro, because although it has no SD extension slot, it also counts with more internal memory capacity.
The Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra and Xiaomi Redmi Note 10 Pro both feature incredibly similar battery durations, although the Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra has just 5000mAh of battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.