Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 82.4 | 77.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| Xiaomi | Samsung |
| Android 11 | Android 4.4.2 |
| 2021-03-24 | 2014-06-23 |
| 6.46 x 3.01 x 0.32 inches | 5.67 x 2.91 x 0.35 inches |
| 6.77 ounces | 5.57 ounces |
| Glacier Blue, Gradient Bronze and Onyx Gray | Blue and Red |
| Glass | -- |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 279.00 | $ 299.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 5.1 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 1080 x 1920 pixels (Full HD) |
| AMOLED | Super AMOLED |
| 393 pixels per inch | 432 pixels per inch |
| 1200 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | Capacitive, Multi-touch |
| 9 | 9.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 732G SM7150-AC chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 801 MSM8974-AC chipset |
| Kryo 470, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor | Krait 400 (Quad-Core 2500 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 2 GB (800 MHz) RAM |
| Adreno 618 GPU | Adreno 330 (450 MHz) GPU |
| 9.36 | 9.36 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 16 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | microSD, microSDHC, microSDXC (up to 128 GB) external memory slot |
| 11.74 | 6.72 |
| Camera | |
| 108.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 16.00 MP + 2.00 MP |
| f/1.90 aperture | f/2.20 aperture |
| -- | 0.38 inches (1/2.6") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 12.1 | 9.79 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA, HSUPA, UMTS, EDGE, GPRS and GSM |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | SIM |
| 6.7 | 7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5020mAh Battery | 2800mAh Li-Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Removable Battery |
| -- | 390 hours standby time 21 hours talk time |
| 6.8 | 4.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 4.0, EDR |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Infra-red port | Infra-red port |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Xiaomi Redmi Note 10 Pro is slightly better than Galaxy S5 Sport, having an 82.4 score against 77.8. Both phones we compare here include Android OS, but the Xiaomi Redmi Note 10 Pro has the older 11 version and Galaxy S5 Sport has Android 4.4.2 version. The Xiaomi Redmi Note 10 Pro construction is a lot newer and just a little thinner than Galaxy S5 Sport's, although it's somewhat heavier.
The Samsung Galaxy S5 Sport has just a bit better screen than Xiaomi Redmi Note 10 Pro, because although it has a much smaller screen and a little bit worse 1920 x 1080 pixels resolution, it also counts with a little more pixels per display inch. The Samsung Galaxy S5 Sport's processor is just as good as the Xiaomi Redmi Note 10 Pro one, because although the Samsung Galaxy S5 Sport has a lower number of cores and 4 GB less RAM memory, it also counts with an additional GPU.
The Xiaomi Redmi Note 10 Pro shoots much clearer pictures and videos than Galaxy S5 Sport, and although they both have the same 3840x2160 (4K) video quality and the same video frame rate, the Xiaomi Redmi Note 10 Pro also has a camera in the back with a lot better resolution and a larger aperture.
The Xiaomi Redmi Note 10 Pro has a much bigger memory capacity for applications and games than Samsung Galaxy S5 Sport, because it has 64 GB internal storage and a SD memory card expansion slot that holds a maximum of 512 GB. Xiaomi Redmi Note 10 Pro features a much better battery lifetime than Galaxy S5 Sport, because it has a 5020mAh battery size instead of 2800mAh.
Even being the best phone of the ones we compare here, Xiaomi Redmi Note 10 Pro is also cheaper than the other phone, making it an easy decision.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.