Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 82.4 | 79.5 |
| Basic Information | |
| Xiaomi | Samsung |
| Android 11 | -- |
| 2021-03-24 | 2016-03-11 |
| 6.46 x 3.01 x 0.32 inches | 5.61 x 2.74 x 0.31 inches |
| 6.77 ounces | 5.36 ounces |
| Glacier Blue, Gradient Bronze and Onyx Gray | Black, Gold, Pink, Pink gold, Silver and White |
| Glass | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 4) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 279.00 | $ 124.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 5.1 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) |
| AMOLED | Super AMOLED |
| 393 pixels per inch | 576 pixels per inch |
| 1200 cd/m2 brightness | 855 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 9 | 9.6 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 732G SM7150-AC chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 820 MSM8996 chipset |
| Kryo 470, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor | Kryo, 64-bit, 14 nm (Quad-Core 2200 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 618 GPU | Adreno 530 GPU |
| 9.36 | 9 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 32 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 200 GB) external memory slot |
| 11.74 | 8.56 |
| Camera | |
| 108.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 5.00 MP |
| f/1.90 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.4 inches (1/2.5") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 12.1 | 9.79 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5020mAh Battery | 3000mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6.8 | 4.96 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 4.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Infra-red port | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Xiaomi Redmi Note 10 Pro has a global score of 82.4, which is slightly better than the Samsung Galaxy S7's overall score of 79.5. Xiaomi Redmi Note 10 Pro is a notably newer phone than the Samsung Galaxy S7, although it's a little thicker and way heavier. The Samsung Galaxy S7 counts with a bit better screen than Xiaomi Redmi Note 10 Pro, because although it has much lower brightness and a lot smaller display, it also counts with a better 1440 x 2560px resolution and a greater pixel density.
The Xiaomi Redmi Note 10 Pro has just a little better processing power than Galaxy S7, because it has 4 more processing cores and a higher amount of RAM memory. Xiaomi Redmi Note 10 Pro takes much clearer videos and photos than Samsung Galaxy S7, because although it has a smaller camera aperture which is not so good for low-light photos, and they both have the same video frame rates and the same (4K) video definition, the Xiaomi Redmi Note 10 Pro also counts with a lot more megapixels back camera.
The Xiaomi Redmi Note 10 Pro has a much greater storage for games and applications than Galaxy S7, because it has 64 GB internal storage and an external memory slot that supports a maximum of 512 GB. Xiaomi Redmi Note 10 Pro counts with a very superior battery lifetime than Galaxy S7, because it has 5020mAh of battery capacity against 3000mAh.
Although Xiaomi Redmi Note 10 Pro is a better device, it is way more expensive than the Galaxy S7, and it doesn't have such a good price and quality relation as the Galaxy S7. If you want to save a few dollars, you can buy the Galaxy S7, and give up a few features and specs, but you'll get the most out of your savings.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.