Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 82.4 | 75.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| Xiaomi | Samsung |
| Android 11 | -- |
| 2021-03-24 | 2016-06-10 |
| 6.46 x 3.01 x 0.32 inches | 5.86 x 2.95 x 0.39 inches |
| 6.77 ounces | 6.53 ounces |
| Glacier Blue, Gradient Bronze and Onyx Gray | Camo green, Sandy gold and Titanium gray |
| Glass | Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 279.00 | $ 247.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 5.1 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) |
| AMOLED | Super AMOLED |
| 393 pixels per inch | 576 pixels per inch |
| 1200 cd/m2 brightness | 500 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 9 | 9.3 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 732G SM7150-AC chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 820 MSM8996 chipset |
| Kryo 470, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor | Kryo, 64-bit, 14 nm (Quad-Core 2150 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 618 GPU | Adreno 530 GPU |
| 9.36 | 8.91 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 32 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 200 GB) external memory slot |
| 11.74 | 8.56 |
| Camera | |
| 108.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 5.00 MP |
| f/1.90 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 12.1 | 9.46 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | -- |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | HSPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 3 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5020mAh Battery | 4000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6.8 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 4.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Infra-red port | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Xiaomi Redmi Note 10 Pro is just a bit better than Galaxy S7 Active, having a global score of 82.4 against 75.8. The Xiaomi Redmi Note 10 Pro design is way newer and somewhat thinner than Galaxy S7 Active's, but it is also just a little heavier. The Xiaomi Redmi Note 10 Pro features a bit faster CPU than Galaxy S7 Active, because it has a greater number of cores (and they are faster) and a higher amount of RAM.
Samsung Galaxy S7 Active has a little sharper screen than Xiaomi Redmi Note 10 Pro, because although it has much less brightness and a way smaller screen, it also counts with a better 1440 x 2560 resolution and a greater amount of pixels per inch in the screen. Xiaomi Redmi Note 10 Pro shoots much clearer photos and videos than Galaxy S7 Active, because although it has a tinier aperture which is worse for low light photos and videos, and they both have the same video resolution and the same 30 frames per second video frame rate, the Xiaomi Redmi Note 10 Pro also counts with a lot more mega-pixels back-facing camera.
Xiaomi Redmi Note 10 Pro has a way bigger memory for applications, games, photos and videos than Galaxy S7 Active, because it has a SD extension slot that holds a maximum of 512 GB and 32 GB more internal memory. The Xiaomi Redmi Note 10 Pro features improved battery lifetime than Galaxy S7 Active, because it has a 5020mAh battery size.
Xiaomi Redmi Note 10 Pro costs a bit more than the Samsung Galaxy S7 Active, but it's still a convenient choice, as you can get a much better phone for that extra money.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.