Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 82.4 | 83.3 |
| Basic Information | |
| Xiaomi | Samsung |
| Android 11 | -- |
| 2021-03-24 | 2018-03-16 |
| 6.46 x 3.01 x 0.32 inches | 5.81 x 2.70 x 0.33 inches |
| 6.77 ounces | 5.75 ounces |
| Glacier Blue, Gradient Bronze and Onyx Gray | Burgundy red, Coral blue, Ice blue, Lilac purple, Midnight black, Sunrise gold and Titanium gray |
| Glass | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 279.00 | $ 158.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 5.8 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2960 x 1440 pixels |
| AMOLED | Super AMOLED |
| 393 pixels per inch | 568 pixels per inch |
| 1200 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 9 | 8.9 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 732G SM7150-AC chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 SDM845 chipset |
| Kryo 470, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor | Kryo 385, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2800 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 618 GPU | Adreno 630 GPU |
| 9.36 | 9.54 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 400 GB) external memory slot |
| 11.74 | 11.34 |
| Camera | |
| 108.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.90 aperture | f/1.50 aperture |
| -- | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 12.1 | 10.23 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5020mAh Battery | 3000mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6.8 | 4.96 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Infra-red port | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Galaxy S9 is a bit better than the Xiaomi Redmi Note 10 Pro, with a global score of 83.3 against 82.4. The Galaxy S9 is a much older and just a little thicker phone than the Xiaomi Redmi Note 10 Pro, but Samsung was able to make it lighter anyway. The Xiaomi Redmi Note 10 Pro has just a bit better display than Samsung Galaxy S9, because although it has a lot lesser pixels per inch in the screen and a way lower 1080 x 2400 resolution, it also counts with a bigger screen.
Xiaomi Redmi Note 10 Pro counts with a bit bigger memory for applications, games, photos and videos than Samsung Galaxy S9, and although they both have exactly the same internal storage, the Xiaomi Redmi Note 10 Pro also has a SD extension slot that allows a maximum of 512 GB. The Galaxy S9 counts with a bit more powerful processing unit than Xiaomi Redmi Note 10 Pro, although it has a lower amount of RAM, they both have 8 cpu cores.
Xiaomi Redmi Note 10 Pro has a very superior battery performance than Galaxy S9, because it has a 5020mAh battery capacity. The Xiaomi Redmi Note 10 Pro takes much better photographs and videos than Samsung Galaxy S9, because although it has a way smaller aperture which is not so good for taking photographs and video in low light situations and worse video frame rates, and they both have the same 3840x2160 (4K) video quality, the Xiaomi Redmi Note 10 Pro also counts with a camera with way more mega pixels.
The Galaxy S9 not only is the best phones of the ones we compare here, but it's also very cheap compared to the other ones, which makes this phone a great choice.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.