Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 82.4 | 80.1 |
| Basic Information | |
| Xiaomi | Samsung |
| Android 11 | Android 8.0 Oreo |
| 2021-03-24 | 2020-04-04 |
| 6.46 x 3.01 x 0.32 inches | 6.24 x 3.18 x 0.56 inches |
| 6.77 ounces | 9.03 ounces |
| Glacier Blue, Gradient Bronze and Onyx Gray | Black |
| Glass | Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 279.00 | $ 1105.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 5.1 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) |
| AMOLED | -- |
| 393 pixels per inch | 576 pixels per inch |
| 1200 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 9 | 8.9 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 732G SM7150-AC chipset | Samsung Exynos 9810 chipset |
| Kryo 470, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor | Exynos M3 and ARM Cortex-A55, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2700 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 618 GPU | Mali-G72 MP18 GPU |
| 9.36 | 9.45 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 11.74 | 11.74 |
| Camera | |
| 108.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.90 aperture | f/1.50 aperture |
| -- | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 1920 x 1080 (Full HD) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 12.1 | 8.14 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5020mAh Battery | 4500mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Removable Battery |
| 6.8 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Infra-red port | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Xiaomi Redmi Note 10 Pro has a global score of 82.4, which is just a bit better than Samsung Galaxy XCover FieldPro's global score of 80.1. Both phones we compare here come with Android operating system, but the Xiaomi Redmi Note 10 Pro has the older 11 version and Samsung Galaxy XCover FieldPro has Android 8.0 Oreo. The Xiaomi Redmi Note 10 Pro construction is newer, way lighter and incredibly thinner than Samsung Galaxy XCover FieldPro.
The Samsung Galaxy XCover FieldPro features a bit more powerful processor than Xiaomi Redmi Note 10 Pro, although it has less RAM memory, they both have a Octa-Core processing unit. Xiaomi Redmi Note 10 Pro features a bit more vivid display than Samsung Galaxy XCover FieldPro, because although it has a bit lower 1080 x 2400 resolution and a lot lower pixel density, it also counts with a lot bigger screen.
The Samsung Galaxy XCover FieldPro and Xiaomi Redmi Note 10 Pro both feature really similar memory capacity to install games and applications, both of them have a SD memory card expansion slot that admits a maximum of 512 GB and equal internal storage capacity. Xiaomi Redmi Note 10 Pro features a bit better battery performance than Galaxy XCover FieldPro, because it has 5020mAh of battery capacity instead of 4500mAh.
The Xiaomi Redmi Note 10 Pro captures greater videos and photos than Galaxy XCover FieldPro, because although it has a lot tinier aperture which is not so good for taking pictures and video in low light situations, it also counts with a way better 108 MP resolution back-facing camera and a way better 3840x2160 video quality.
In addition to being the best phone in our current comparison, Xiaomi Redmi Note 10 Pro is also a bargain compared to the other phones, which makes it a great choice.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.