Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 78.3 | 88.1 |
| Basic Information | |
| Xiaomi | Apple |
| Android 11 | -- |
| 2021-04-20 | 2017-11-03 |
| 6.32 x 2.93 x 0.33 inches | 5.65 x 2.79 x 0.30 inches |
| 6.31 ounces | 6.14 ounces |
| Lake Green, Onyx Gray and Pebble White | Silver and Space gray |
| -- | Glass and Stainless steel |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 199.00 | $ 1149.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.4 inches | 5.8 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2436 x 1125 pixels |
| AMOLED | OLED |
| 411 pixels per inch | 463 pixels per inch |
| 1100 cd/m2 brightness | 625 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 9 | 8.9 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 678 chipset | Apple A11 Bionic APL1W72 (10 nm) chipset |
| Kryo 460, 64-bit, 11 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor | 64-bit Monsoon and Mistral, 64-bit (Hexa-Core 2390 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 3 GB RAM |
| Adreno 612 GPU | Apple 3-core GPU GPU |
| 9.18 | 10.17 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 11.74 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 13.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 7.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 28.00mm focal length |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | 0.33 inches (1/3") sensor |
| -- | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 9.9 | 10.12 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Battery | 2716mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6.8 | 4.72 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Infra-red port | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | -- |
| Accelerometer, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Apple iPhone X has a score of 88.1, which is better than Xiaomi Redmi Note 10's 78.3 score. The Apple iPhone X is an extremely older device than the Xiaomi Redmi Note 10, but Apple was able to build it just a little lighter and a bit thinner. IPhone X features a quite superior hardware performance than Xiaomi Redmi Note 10, because although it has less RAM and 2 lesser cpu cores , it also counts with a 64-bits processor.
The Xiaomi Redmi Note 10 features a little more vivid display than iPhone X, because although it has a little bit lower amount of pixels per display inch and a quite lower resolution of 1080 x 2400px, it also counts with a little bit bigger display and way more brightness. IPhone X has a better memory for applications, games, photos and videos than Xiaomi Redmi Note 10, because although it has no external memory slot, it also counts with 256 GB internal memory capacity.
The iPhone X has a slightly better camera than Xiaomi Redmi Note 10, although it has a camera in the back with a much worse resolution and a much smaller back-facing camera sensor capturing much worse quality pictures and videos, they both have a same size diafragm aperture. Xiaomi Redmi Note 10 has a superior battery duration than iPhone X, because it has a 5000mAh battery capacity instead of 2716mAh.
Although iPhone X is a better device, it costs a lot more than the Xiaomi Redmi Note 10, and it doesn't have such a good quality/price relation as Xiaomi Redmi Note 10. So if you need that extra specs, you can buy the iPhone X, else you can save a couple dollars and get the Xiaomi Redmi Note 10, resigning some specs and features.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.