Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 78.3 | 80.7 |
| Basic Information | |
| Xiaomi | |
| Android 11 | -- |
| 2021-04-20 | 2018-10-18 |
| 6.32 x 2.93 x 0.33 inches | 6.22 x 3.02 x 0.31 inches |
| 6.31 ounces | 6.49 ounces |
| Lake Green, Onyx Gray and Pebble White | Black, Pink and White |
| -- | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 199.00 | $ 194.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.4 inches | 6.3 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2960 x 1440 pixels |
| AMOLED | Super AMOLED |
| 411 pixels per inch | 522 pixels per inch |
| 1100 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 9 | 8.7 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 678 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 SDM845 chipset |
| Kryo 460, 64-bit, 11 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor | Kryo 385, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2500 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 612 GPU | Adreno 630 GPU |
| 9.18 | 9.36 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 11.74 | 7.7 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 13.00 MP | 12.20 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 28.00mm focal length |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| -- | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 9.9 | 9.79 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Battery | 3430mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6.8 | 5.44 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Infra-red port | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Google Pixel 3 XL has a score of 80.7, which is just a bit better than Xiaomi Redmi Note 10's 78.3 overall score. The Google Pixel 3 XL is a way older and just a bit heavier phone than the Xiaomi Redmi Note 10, but Google made it just a little thinner anyway. Google Pixel 3 XL features a little better processing power than Xiaomi Redmi Note 10. Both have the same RAM memory amount and the same number of cores.
The Xiaomi Redmi Note 10 features a bit better looking screen than Google Pixel 3 XL, because although it has a bit less pixels per display inch and a way lower resolution of 1080 x 2400px, it also counts with a little bit larger display. The Xiaomi Redmi Note 10 features a bit better camera than Google Pixel 3 XL, and although they both have a F1.8 aperture, the Xiaomi Redmi Note 10 also has a much better 48 MP resolution back facing camera and a way bigger camera sensor taking more light and vivid colors.
The Xiaomi Redmi Note 10 counts with a lot bigger storage capacity to install games and applications than Google Pixel 3 XL, and although they both have equal 64 GB internal memory capacity, the Xiaomi Redmi Note 10 also has a slot for an SD memory card that admits up to 512 GB. Xiaomi Redmi Note 10 has a way better battery life than Google Pixel 3 XL, because it has a 46 percent more battery size.
Despite of being the best phone between the ones we are comparing, Google Pixel 3 XL is also cheaper than the Xiaomi Redmi Note 10, which makes this phone a simple decision.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.