Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 78.3 | 78.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| Xiaomi | |
| Android 11 | Android 11, 10, 9.0 Pie |
| 2021-04-20 | 2019-05-07 |
| 6.32 x 2.93 x 0.33 inches | 5.96 x 2.76 x 0.32 inches |
| 6.31 ounces | 5.19 ounces |
| Lake Green, Onyx Gray and Pebble White | Black, Purple and White |
| -- | Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 199.00 | $ 186.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.4 inches | 5.6 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2220 x 1080 pixels |
| AMOLED | OLED |
| 411 pixels per inch | 441 pixels per inch |
| 1100 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 9 | 8.2 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 678 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 670 SDM670 chipset |
| Kryo 460, 64-bit, 11 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor | Kryo 360, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 612 GPU | Adreno 615 GPU |
| 9.18 | 9.09 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 11.74 | 7.7 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 13.00 MP | 12.20 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 28.00mm focal length |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| -- | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 9.9 | 9.79 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Battery | 3000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.8 | 4.96 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Infra-red port | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Google Pixel 3a has a global score of 78.8, which is a bit better than Xiaomi Redmi Note 10's 78.3 score. Google Pixel 3a's design is somewhat lighter and a bit thinner than Xiaomi Redmi Note 10, despite of the fact that it was released many years before. Both of these phones come with the same Android 11 operating system, so both of them should provide you the same operating system features.
The Xiaomi Redmi Note 10 has just a bit better performance than Google Pixel 3a. Both have the same number of cores and 4 GB of RAM. The Xiaomi Redmi Note 10 features a bit more vivid screen than Google Pixel 3a, because although it has a just a bit lower amount of pixels per screen inch, it also counts with a little bit higher 1080 x 2400px resolution and a bit larger display.
Xiaomi Redmi Note 10 counts with a much better memory for applications and games than Google Pixel 3a, and although they both have equal 64 GB internal storage capacity, the Xiaomi Redmi Note 10 also has a SD extension slot that allows up to 512 GB. The Xiaomi Redmi Note 10 shoots just a bit better photos and videos than Google Pixel 3a, and although they both have a same size aperture, the Xiaomi Redmi Note 10 also has a way better 48 mega pixels resolution back camera and a way larger back camera sensor taking more light and vivid colors.
Xiaomi Redmi Note 10 counts with a way better battery duration than Google Pixel 3a, because it has 5000mAh of battery capacity.
Even being the best phone of the ones we are comparing, the Google Pixel 3a is also cheap compared to the Xiaomi Redmi Note 10.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.