Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 78.3 | 78.9 |
| Basic Information | |
| Xiaomi | |
| Android 11 | Android 11, 10, 9.0 Pie |
| 2021-04-20 | 2019-05-07 |
| 6.32 x 2.93 x 0.33 inches | 6.30 x 3.00 x 0.32 inches |
| 6.31 ounces | 5.89 ounces |
| Lake Green, Onyx Gray and Pebble White | Black, Purple and White |
| -- | Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 199.00 | $ 167.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.4 inches | 6 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2160 x 1080 pixels |
| AMOLED | OLED |
| 411 pixels per inch | 402 pixels per inch |
| 1100 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 9 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 678 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 670 SDM670 chipset |
| Kryo 460, 64-bit, 11 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor | Kryo 360, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 612 GPU | Adreno 615 GPU |
| 9.18 | 9.09 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 11.74 | 7.7 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 13.00 MP | 12.20 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 28.00mm focal length |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| -- | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 9.9 | 9.79 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Battery | 3700mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.8 | 5.68 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Infra-red port | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Google Pixel 3a XL is slightly better than Xiaomi Redmi Note 10, with a general score of 78.9 against 78.3. Both phones we compare here work with the same Android 11 OS (operating system). Google Pixel 3a XL's design is a bit thinner and just a bit lighter than Xiaomi Redmi Note 10, despite of the fact that it was released 2 years before.
Xiaomi Redmi Note 10 counts with a little faster processor than Google Pixel 3a XL. Both of them have a Octa-Core processing unit and a 4 GB RAM memory. The Xiaomi Redmi Note 10 features a more vivid display than Google Pixel 3a XL, because it has a little more pixels per inch in the screen, a little bit larger display and a slightly better resolution of 1080 x 2400 pixels.
The Xiaomi Redmi Note 10 captures just a bit better photos and videos than Google Pixel 3a XL, and although they both have the same aperture, the Xiaomi Redmi Note 10 also has a much more mega-pixels back-facing camera and a much larger back camera sensor taking way higher quality photos. The Xiaomi Redmi Note 10 counts with a much greater memory to store more apps and games than Google Pixel 3a XL, and although they both have exactly the same 64 GB internal memory capacity, the Xiaomi Redmi Note 10 also has an external SD slot that supports up to 512 GB.
Xiaomi Redmi Note 10 features greater battery performance than Google Pixel 3a XL, because it has 5000mAh of battery capacity against 3700mAh.
Even being the best phone between the ones we are comparing, the Google Pixel 3a XL is also very cheap compared to the other ones.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.