Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 78.3 | 81.9 |
| Basic Information | |
| Xiaomi | |
| Android 11 | -- |
| 2021-04-20 | 2019-10-24 |
| 6.32 x 2.93 x 0.33 inches | 5.79 x 2.71 x 0.32 inches |
| 6.31 ounces | 5.71 ounces |
| Lake Green, Onyx Gray and Pebble White | Clearly white, Just black and Oh so orange |
| -- | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 199.00 | $ 339.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.4 inches | 5.7 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2280 x 1080 pixels |
| AMOLED | OLED |
| 411 pixels per inch | 443 pixels per inch |
| 1100 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 9 | 8.4 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 678 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 SM8150 chipset |
| Kryo 460, 64-bit, 11 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor | Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 612 GPU | Adreno 640 GPU |
| 9.18 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 11.74 | 7.7 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 13.00 MP | 12.20 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| -- | 28.00mm focal length |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| -- | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 9.9 | 9.79 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Battery | 2800mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6.8 | 4.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Infra-red port | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | -- |
| Accelerometer, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Google Pixel 4 is slightly better than the Xiaomi Redmi Note 10, having a global score of 81.9 against 78.3. Google Pixel 4's design is a little bit thinner and a little lighter than the Xiaomi Redmi Note 10, although it was released about 18 months before. The Xiaomi Redmi Note 10 features a little bit better screen than Google Pixel 4, because although it has a just a bit worse display pixels density, it also counts with a little larger screen and a bit higher resolution of 1080 x 2400.
Google Pixel 4 features just a little better performance than Xiaomi Redmi Note 10, and although they both have a Octa-Core CPU, the Google Pixel 4 also has a larger amount of RAM. The Xiaomi Redmi Note 10 features a lot bigger storage capacity to store more apps and games than Google Pixel 4, and although they both have equal internal storage capacity, the Xiaomi Redmi Note 10 also has a slot for external memory cards that admits a maximum of 512 GB.
The Xiaomi Redmi Note 10 features a way better battery performance than Google Pixel 4, because it has a 79% more battery capacity. Xiaomi Redmi Note 10 captures a little bit better photographs and videos than Google Pixel 4, because although it has a smaller diafragm aperture, it also counts with a back facing camera with a much better 48 megapixels resolution and a way bigger back-facing camera sensor providing a much better image quality.
Although Google Pixel 4 is a better device, it is a lot more expensive than the Xiaomi Redmi Note 10, and it doesn't have such a good quality/price relation as the Xiaomi Redmi Note 10. So if you want that extra features, you can buy the Google Pixel 4, otherwise you can save a couple dollars and buy the Xiaomi Redmi Note 10, letting go a couple features and specs.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.