Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 78.3 | 87.5 |
| Basic Information | |
| Xiaomi | |
| Android 11 | Android 11 |
| 2021-04-20 | 2020-11-19 |
| 6.32 x 2.93 x 0.33 inches | 6.06 x 2.91 x 0.32 inches |
| 6.31 ounces | 5.93 ounces |
| Lake Green, Onyx Gray and Pebble White | Clearly white and Just black |
| -- | Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 199.00 | $ 500.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.4 inches | 6.2 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| AMOLED | OLED |
| 411 pixels per inch | 416 pixels per inch |
| 1100 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 9 | 8.2 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 678 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G SM7250-AB chipset |
| Kryo 460, 64-bit, 11 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor | Kryo 475, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2400 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 612 GPU | Adreno 620 GPU |
| 9.18 | 9.36 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 11.74 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 13.00 MP | 12.20 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| -- | 28.00mm focal length |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| -- | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 9.9 | 10.23 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Battery | 3885mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.8 | 5.84 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Infra-red port | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Google Pixel 4a 5G is better than Xiaomi Redmi Note 10, getting an 87.5 score against 78.3. These devices use the same Android 11 OS (operating system), so both should offer very similar OS features. The Google Pixel 4a 5G is a just a little lighter and just a little thinner cellphone than the Xiaomi Redmi Note 10, even when both were only released with a few months difference.
Google Pixel 4a 5G has a little better performance than Xiaomi Redmi Note 10, and although they both have 8 processing cores, the Google Pixel 4a 5G also has a larger amount of RAM memory. Xiaomi Redmi Note 10 has a bit more vivid display than Google Pixel 4a 5G, because although it has a bit worse display pixels density, it also counts with a slightly better 1080 x 2400 resolution and a quite larger display.
The Xiaomi Redmi Note 10 counts with more memory to install games and applications than Google Pixel 4a 5G, because although it has only 64 GB internal storage, it also counts with a slot for an SD memory card that supports up to 512 GB. The Xiaomi Redmi Note 10 has better battery performance than Google Pixel 4a 5G, because it has 5000mAh of battery capacity instead of 3885mAh.
Google Pixel 4a 5G takes a bit better videos and photos than Xiaomi Redmi Note 10, because although it has a camera in the back with a much worse 12.2 mega pixels resolution and a way smaller back-facing camera sensor which provides a way worse image and video quality, it also counts with a larger diafragm aperture to capture better photography and videos in poorly lited situations.
Although Google Pixel 4a 5G is a better device, it is a lot more expensive than the Xiaomi Redmi Note 10, and it doesn't have such a good relation between it's price and quality as Xiaomi Redmi Note 10. So if you want that extra specs and features, you can buy the Google Pixel 4a 5G, otherwise you can save some dollars and buy the Xiaomi Redmi Note 10, letting go a couple specs and features.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.