Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 78.3 | 77.7 |
| Basic Information | |
| Xiaomi | HTC |
| Android 11 | Android 5.0 |
| 2021-04-20 | 2015-03-01 |
| 6.32 x 2.93 x 0.33 inches | 5.69 x 2.74 x 0.38 inches |
| 6.31 ounces | 5.54 ounces |
| Lake Green, Onyx Gray and Pebble White | Black, Gold, Gray and Pink |
| -- | Aluminium |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 199.00 | $ 178.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.4 inches | 5 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 1080 x 1920 pixels (Full HD) |
| AMOLED | S-LCD 3 |
| 411 pixels per inch | 441 pixels per inch |
| 1100 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | Capacitive, Multi-touch |
| 9 | 9.3 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 678 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 810 MSM8994 chipset |
| Kryo 460, 64-bit, 11 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor | 64-bit ARM Cortex-A57 (Quad-Core 2000 MHz + Quad-Core 1500 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 3 GB (800 MHz) RAM |
| Adreno 612 GPU | Adreno 430 (600 MHz) GPU |
| 9.18 | 9.99 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 32 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | microSD, microSDHC, microSDXC (up to 128 GB) external memory slot |
| 11.74 | 8.12 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 13.00 MP | 20.00 MP + 4.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/2.20 aperture |
| -- | 27.80mm focal length |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | 0.42 inches (1/2.4") sensor |
| -- | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 9.9 | 10.12 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA, HSUPA, EDGE, GPRS and GSM |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Battery | 2840mAh Li-Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | 391 hours standby time 25.4 hours talk time |
| 6.8 | 4.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 4.1 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Infra-red port | Infra-red port |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | -- |
| Accelerometer, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Xiaomi Redmi Note 10 has a global score of 78.3, which is a bit better than the HTC One M9's 77.7 overall score. The Xiaomi Redmi Note 10 construction is much newer and somewhat thinner than HTC One M9's, although it is somewhat heavier. These phones work with Android OS, but Xiaomi Redmi Note 10 has a newer 11 version while HTC One M9 has Android 5.0 version.
HTC One M9 has a little sharper display than Xiaomi Redmi Note 10, because although it has a little bit worse resolution of 1920 x 1080 pixels and a lot smaller screen, it also counts with a little greater pixels quantity per inch of display. The HTC One M9 has a little bit better performance than Xiaomi Redmi Note 10, because although it has a lower amount of RAM, and they both have 8 cores, the HTC One M9 also counts with an additional GPU and a 64 bits processing unit.
The Xiaomi Redmi Note 10 features a much greater storage capacity to store more games and applications than HTC One M9, because it has a SD memory card expansion slot that allows up to 512 GB and 64 GB internal memory. The HTC One M9 features a little bit better camera than Xiaomi Redmi Note 10, although it has a tinier camera sensor which offers a lower image and video quality, a lot worse 20 mega pixels resolution back facing camera and a smaller aperture which is not recommended for low light captures and video.
Xiaomi Redmi Note 10 features a way better battery lifetime than HTC One M9, because it has 5000mAh of battery capacity instead of 2840mAh.
Although Xiaomi Redmi Note 10 is a better device, it costs a little more than the HTC One M9, and it doesn't have such a good quality/price relation as the HTC One M9. If you prefer to save a few dollars, you can get the HTC One M9, and give up a couple features, but you will get the most with your budget.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.