Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 78.3 | 77 |
| Basic Information | |
| Xiaomi | HTC |
| Android 11 | -- |
| 2021-04-20 | 2017-02-21 |
| 6.32 x 2.93 x 0.33 inches | 6.39 x 3.14 x 0.31 inches |
| 6.31 ounces | 6.00 ounces |
| Lake Green, Onyx Gray and Pebble White | 16 777 216 |
| -- | Aluminum and Glass |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 199.00 | $ 749.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.4 inches | 5.7 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) |
| AMOLED | S-LCD 5 |
| 411 pixels per inch | 515 pixels per inch |
| 1100 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 9 | 8.5 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 678 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 821 MSM8996 Pro-AB chipset |
| Kryo 460, 64-bit, 11 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor | Kryo, 64-bit (Quad-Core 2150 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 612 GPU | Adreno 530 GPU |
| 9.18 | 8.91 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 11.74 | 14.66 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 13.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | 0.43 inches (1/2.3") sensor |
| -- | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (120 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 9.9 | 9.9 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Battery | 3000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.8 | 4.96 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 4.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Infra-red port | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Xiaomi Redmi Note 10 has a score of 78.3, which is just a bit better than HTC U Ultra's 77 score. Xiaomi Redmi Note 10's design is extremely newer than HTC U Ultra's, but it's just a bit thicker and a little bit heavier. Xiaomi Redmi Note 10 counts with just a bit better looking screen than HTC U Ultra, because although it has a bit lower 1080 x 2400 resolution and a little lower pixels amount in each inch in the display, it also counts with a quite larger display.
The HTC U Ultra features a very superior storage capacity for applications, games, photos and videos than Xiaomi Redmi Note 10, and although they both have equal internal storage capacity, the HTC U Ultra also has a slot for SD memory cards that allows up to 1,95 TB. The Xiaomi Redmi Note 10 has a bit better performance than HTC U Ultra, and although they both have a 4 GB RAM, the Xiaomi Redmi Note 10 also has a higher number of cores.
The HTC U Ultra and Xiaomi Redmi Note 10 both count with similar cameras, and although the HTC U Ultra has a much less MP resolution back facing camera and a smaller sensor taking lower quality videos and images, they both have a F1.8 aperture. Xiaomi Redmi Note 10 counts with a way better battery performance than HTC U Ultra, because it has 5000mAh of battery capacity against 3000mAh.
The Xiaomi Redmi Note 10 not only is the best devices in our comparison, but it's also a bargain compared to the other devices, making this phone an obvious call.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.