Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 78.3 | 77.6 |
| Basic Information | |
| Xiaomi | HTC |
| Android 11 | -- |
| 2021-04-20 | 2017-05-18 |
| 6.32 x 2.93 x 0.33 inches | 6.06 x 2.99 x 0.31 inches |
| 6.31 ounces | 5.96 ounces |
| Lake Green, Onyx Gray and Pebble White | Black, Blue, Silver and White |
| -- | Glass and Metal |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 199.00 | $ 275.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.4 inches | 5.5 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) |
| AMOLED | S-LCD 5 |
| 411 pixels per inch | 534 pixels per inch |
| 1100 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 9 | 8.7 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 678 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 835 MSM8998 chipset |
| Kryo 460, 64-bit, 11 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor | Kryo 280, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2450 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 612 GPU | Adreno 540 GPU |
| 9.18 | 9.36 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 128 GB) external memory slot |
| 11.74 | 10.02 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 13.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| -- | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (120 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 9.9 | 9.9 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Battery | 3000mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.8 | 4.96 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Infra-red port | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Xiaomi Redmi Note 10 has a score of 78.3, which is slightly better than HTC U11's general score of 77.6. The Xiaomi Redmi Note 10 is a noticeably newer cellphone than the HTC U11, although it is just a bit heavier and a bit thicker. HTC U11 features a bit better CPU than Xiaomi Redmi Note 10. Both of them have 8 cpu cores and 4 GB of RAM.
Xiaomi Redmi Note 10 features a little more vivid screen than HTC U11, because although it has a bit lower 1080 x 2400px resolution and a just a little inferior quantity of pixels per inch in the screen, it also counts with a larger screen. Xiaomi Redmi Note 10 counts with a greater storage capacity for games and applications than HTC U11, and although they both have exactly the same internal storage capacity, the Xiaomi Redmi Note 10 also has a slot for external memory cards that supports a maximum of 512 GB.
HTC U11 and Xiaomi Redmi Note 10 both count with extremely similar cameras, because although the HTC U11 has a much tinier sensor giving a much lower image quality and a way less mega-pixels resolution camera in the back, it also counts with a bigger diafragm aperture to capture better photos in low-light environments.
Xiaomi Redmi Note 10 features a superior battery lifetime than HTC U11, because it has a 5000mAh battery capacity.
Despite of being the best phone between the ones we are comparing, Xiaomi Redmi Note 10 is also very cheap compared to the other phones, making it a great choice.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.