Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 78.3 | 87.1 |
| Basic Information | |
| Xiaomi | Motorola |
| Android 11 | Android 14 |
| 2021-04-20 | 2024-04-16 |
| 6.32 x 2.93 x 0.33 inches | 6.34 x 2.85 x 0.34 inches |
| 6.31 ounces | 6.95 ounces |
| Lake Green, Onyx Gray and Pebble White | Forest Grey (Vegan Leather), Nordic Wood and Peach Fuzz (Vegan Leather) |
| -- | Aluminum, Vegan Leather and Wood |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 199.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.4 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| AMOLED | P-OLED |
| 411 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| 1100 cd/m2 brightness | 2500 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 9 | 9.6 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 678 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8s Gen 3 (4 nm) chipset |
| Kryo 460, 64-bit, 11 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor | processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 12 GB RAM |
| Adreno 612 GPU | Adreno 720 GPU |
| 9.18 | 6.21 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 512 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 11.74 | 17.6 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 13.00 MP | 50.00 MP + 50.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.60 aperture |
| -- | 25.00mm focal length |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | 0.77 inches (1/1.3") sensor |
| -- | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 9.9 | 12.32 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Battery | 4500mAh Nano SIM, eSIM Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6.8 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.4 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Infra-red port | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Motorola Edge 50 Ultra is better than the Xiaomi Redmi Note 10, getting an 87.1 score against 78.3. Even though Motorola Edge 50 Ultra is way newer than the Xiaomi Redmi Note 10, it's a little bit thicker and just a little bit heavier. Both devices in this comparison have Android OS (Operating System), but Motorola Edge 50 Ultra has 14 version and Xiaomi Redmi Note 10 has Android 11 version, so it gives a couple additional features and a performance increase.
The Xiaomi Redmi Note 10 counts with a very superior processor than Motorola Edge 50 Ultra, although it has less RAM memory, they both have a Octa-Core processing unit. The Motorola Edge 50 Ultra features a bit sharper screen than Xiaomi Redmi Note 10, because although it has a just a bit lower pixel quantity per display inch, and they both have the same 1080 x 2400 resolution, the Motorola Edge 50 Ultra also counts with a quite bigger screen and much more brightness.
The Motorola Edge 50 Ultra takes much clearer photos and videos than Xiaomi Redmi Note 10, because it has a back camera with a higher 50 megapixels resolution, a much bigger sensor taking more light and vivid colors and a larger diafragm aperture to take better photos in low-light situations. Motorola Edge 50 Ultra has a very superior storage capacity to install applications and games than Xiaomi Redmi Note 10, because although it has no slot for SD memory cards, it also counts with 512 GB internal memory.
Xiaomi Redmi Note 10 features a little better battery duration than Motorola Edge 50 Ultra, because it has 5000mAh of battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.