Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 78.3 | 83.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| Xiaomi | Samsung |
| Android 11 | -- |
| 2021-04-20 | 2019-03-15 |
| 6.32 x 2.93 x 0.33 inches | 6.24 x 2.93 x 0.30 inches |
| 6.31 ounces | 5.86 ounces |
| Lake Green, Onyx Gray and Pebble White | Black, Blue, Coral and White |
| -- | Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 199.00 | $ 202.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.4 inches | 6.4 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| AMOLED | Super AMOLED |
| 411 pixels per inch | 403 pixels per inch |
| 1100 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 9 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 678 chipset | Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 9610 chipset |
| Kryo 460, 64-bit, 11 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor | ARM Cortex-A73 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 612 GPU | Mali-G72 MP3 GPU |
| 9.18 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 11.74 | 14.14 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 13.00 MP | 25.00 MP + 25.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| -- | 27.00mm focal length |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | 0.36 inches (1/2.8") sensor |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 9.9 | 10.12 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Battery | 4000mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.8 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Infra-red port | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Galaxy A50 is a bit better than the Xiaomi Redmi Note 10, having a overall score of 83.8 against 78.3. Despite of the fact that the Galaxy A50 is extremely older than the Xiaomi Redmi Note 10, it's construction is just a bit lighter and a bit thinner. The Xiaomi Redmi Note 10 counts with a brighter display than Galaxy A50, and although they both have a display with the same size, the Xiaomi Redmi Note 10 also has a slightly better resolution of 1080 x 2400 and a little more pixels per inch in the screen.
The Galaxy A50 counts with a bit superior processing unit than Xiaomi Redmi Note 10. Both of them have a Octa-Core CPU and 4 GB of RAM memory. The Galaxy A50 has a very superior memory for games and applications than Xiaomi Redmi Note 10, and although they both have an external memory slot that holds a maximum of 512 GB, the Galaxy A50 also has more internal memory capacity.
Samsung Galaxy A50 captures clearer videos and photos than Xiaomi Redmi Note 10, because although it has a much worse resolution back-facing camera and a much tinier back-facing camera sensor capturing less light and washed colors, it also counts with a bigger aperture to take better low light captures.
Xiaomi Redmi Note 10 counts with longer battery life than Galaxy A50, because it has a 5000mAh battery capacity.
The Galaxy A50 costs a bit more money than the Xiaomi Redmi Note 10, but it's still a great choice, as you can get a lot more features for that extra money.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.