Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 78.3 | 91.3 |
| Basic Information | |
| Xiaomi | Samsung |
| Android 11 | Android 12, 11 |
| 2021-04-20 | 2021-03-19 |
| 6.32 x 2.93 x 0.33 inches | 6.30 x 2.96 x 0.33 inches |
| 6.31 ounces | 6.67 ounces |
| Lake Green, Onyx Gray and Pebble White | -- |
| -- | Plastic and Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 199.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.4 inches | 6.5 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| AMOLED | Super AMOLED |
| 411 pixels per inch | 405 pixels per inch |
| 1100 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 9 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 678 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 750G SM7225 (8 nm) chipset |
| Kryo 460, 64-bit, 11 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor | Kryo 570, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 612 GPU | Adreno 619 GPU |
| 9.18 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot |
| 11.74 | 15.42 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 13.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor |
| -- | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 9.9 | 12.1 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Battery | 4500mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.8 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Infra-red port | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Samsung Galaxy A52 5G has a score of 91.3, which is better than Xiaomi Redmi Note 10's 78.3 global score. Samsung Galaxy A52 5G's design has the same thickness than the Xiaomi Redmi Note 10, but it is a bit heavier. These phones use Android OS, but Samsung Galaxy A52 5G has the newer 12 version while Xiaomi Redmi Note 10 has Android 11, so it provides some additional features and increased performance.
The Galaxy A52 5G counts with a little faster CPU than Xiaomi Redmi Note 10, and although they both have the same number of cores, the Galaxy A52 5G also has a higher amount of RAM. Xiaomi Redmi Note 10 counts with a more vivid screen than Galaxy A52 5G, because although it has a bit smaller display, and they both have an equal 1080 x 2400 pixels resolution, the Xiaomi Redmi Note 10 also counts with a quite higher quantity of pixels per display inch.
Galaxy A52 5G has a much better memory to install games and applications than Xiaomi Redmi Note 10, because it has 128 GB internal memory capacity and a SD memory slot that allows a maximum of 1 TB. Galaxy A52 5G has a greater camera than Xiaomi Redmi Note 10, and although they both have a F1.8 aperture, the Galaxy A52 5G also has a lot higher 64 mega pixels resolution back facing camera and a bigger back-facing camera sensor which gives a higher photo and video quality.
Xiaomi Redmi Note 10 counts with just a bit longer battery lifetime than Samsung Galaxy A52 5G, because it has an 11 percent more battery size.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.