Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 78.3 | 85.2 |
| Basic Information | |
| Xiaomi | Samsung |
| Android 11 | -- |
| 2021-04-20 | 2018-11-15 |
| 6.32 x 2.93 x 0.33 inches | 6.40 x 3.03 x 0.31 inches |
| 6.31 ounces | 6.46 ounces |
| Lake Green, Onyx Gray and Pebble White | Bubblegum pink, Caviar black and Lemonade blue |
| -- | Glass and Metal |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 199.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.4 inches | 6.3 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2220 x 1080 pixels |
| AMOLED | Super AMOLED |
| 411 pixels per inch | 392 pixels per inch |
| 1100 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 9 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 678 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 660 SDM660 chipset |
| Kryo 460, 64-bit, 11 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor | Kryo 260, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 612 GPU | Adreno 512 GPU |
| 9.18 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 11.74 | 14.14 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 13.00 MP | 24.00 MP + 24.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| -- | 27.00mm focal length |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | 0.36 inches (1/2.8") sensor |
| -- | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 9.9 | 10.45 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Battery | 3800mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.8 | 5.76 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Infra-red port | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Galaxy A9 (2018) has a score of 85.2, which is a little bit better than the Xiaomi Redmi Note 10's global score of 78.3. Despite of the fact Galaxy A9 (2018) is way older and a bit heavier than Xiaomi Redmi Note 10, it's body is still a little bit thinner. The Xiaomi Redmi Note 10 has a more vivid screen than Galaxy A9 (2018), because it has a quite better 1080 x 2400 resolution, a little bit larger display and a bit greater screen pixel density.
The Galaxy A9 (2018) features a bit superior CPU than Xiaomi Redmi Note 10, and although they both have the same number of cores, the Galaxy A9 (2018) also has a larger amount of RAM. The Samsung Galaxy A9 (2018) features a bit better camera than Xiaomi Redmi Note 10, because although it has a much tinier back-facing camera sensor taking lot lower quality images and videos and a camera with a way worse resolution, it also counts with a bigger aperture for better captures and video in poorly lited situations.
The Samsung Galaxy A9 (2018) counts with a very superior memory capacity to install applications and games than Xiaomi Redmi Note 10, and although they both have a slot for an external memory card that allows a maximum of 512 GB, the Samsung Galaxy A9 (2018) also has more internal storage capacity.
Xiaomi Redmi Note 10 features greater battery performance than Galaxy A9 (2018), because it has a 5000mAh battery capacity against 3800mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.