Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 78.3 | 97.6 |
| Basic Information | |
| Xiaomi | Samsung |
| Android 11 | Android 9.0 Pie |
| 2021-04-20 | 2019-09-27 |
| 6.32 x 2.93 x 0.33 inches | 6.33 x 4.64 x 0.27 inches |
| 6.31 ounces | 9.74 ounces |
| Lake Green, Onyx Gray and Pebble White | Cosmos black and Space silver |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 199.00 | $ 1980.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.4 inches | 7.3 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2152 x 1536 pixels |
| AMOLED | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 411 pixels per inch | 362 pixels per inch |
| 1100 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 9 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 678 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 chipset |
| Kryo 460, 64-bit, 11 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor | Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 12 GB RAM |
| Adreno 612 GPU | Adreno 640 GPU |
| 9.18 | 9.72 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 512 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 11.74 | 17.6 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 13.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.50 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| -- | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 9.9 | 10.23 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Battery | 4380mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6.8 | 6.24 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0, EDR |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Infra-red port | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Galaxy Fold is a lot better than Xiaomi Redmi Note 10, having a 97.6 score against 78.3. The Galaxy Fold is an older and a lot heavier cellphone than the Xiaomi Redmi Note 10, but Samsung was able to build it somewhat thinner anyway. These phones use Android OS, but Galaxy Fold has 9.0 Pie version while Xiaomi Redmi Note 10 has Android 11, counting with a couple nice extra features and performance tweaks.
Xiaomi Redmi Note 10 features a sharper display than Samsung Galaxy Fold, because although it has a quite smaller display and a little bit worse 1080 x 2400 resolution, it also counts with a just a bit higher screen density. The Samsung Galaxy Fold has a superior memory capacity to install applications and games than Xiaomi Redmi Note 10, because although it has no slot for external memory cards, it also counts with more internal storage capacity.
Samsung Galaxy Fold has a bit more powerful processor than Xiaomi Redmi Note 10, and although they both have 8 CPU cores, the Samsung Galaxy Fold also has a greater amount of RAM memory. The Galaxy Fold shoots a little bit better photos and videos than Xiaomi Redmi Note 10, because although it has a way tinier camera sensor and a much lower 12 mega pixels resolution camera, it also counts with a bigger aperture.
The Xiaomi Redmi Note 10 counts with a little longer battery lifetime than Galaxy Fold, because it has a 5000mAh battery capacity.
Although Galaxy Fold is a better device, it is a lot more expensive than the Xiaomi Redmi Note 10, and it doesn't have such a good quality/price relation as Xiaomi Redmi Note 10. So if you want that extra features and specs, you can buy the Galaxy Fold, otherwise you can save some money and buy the Xiaomi Redmi Note 10, letting go a couple features and specs.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.