Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 78.3 | 80.4 |
| Basic Information | |
| Xiaomi | Samsung |
| Android 11 | -- |
| 2021-04-20 | 2017-07-07 |
| 6.32 x 2.93 x 0.33 inches | 6.04 x 2.91 x 0.31 inches |
| 6.31 ounces | 5.89 ounces |
| Lake Green, Onyx Gray and Pebble White | Black, Blue, Gold and Silver |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 199.00 | $ 611.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.4 inches | 5.7 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) |
| AMOLED | Super AMOLED |
| 411 pixels per inch | 515 pixels per inch |
| 1100 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 9 | 8.6 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 678 chipset | Samsung Exynos 8 Octa 8890 chipset |
| Kryo 460, 64-bit, 11 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor | Exynos M1and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 612 GPU | Mali-T880 MP12 GPU |
| 9.18 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 256 GB) external memory slot |
| 11.74 | 10.78 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 13.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 5.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | 0.4 inches (1/2.5") sensor |
| -- | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 9.9 | 9.57 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G) and HSPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.1 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Battery | 3200mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6.8 | 5.2 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 4.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Infra-red port | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Galaxy Note Fan Edition has a global score of 80.4, which is slightly better than Xiaomi Redmi Note 10's 78.3 overall score. The Galaxy Note Fan Edition is an extremely older device than the Xiaomi Redmi Note 10, but Samsung managed to make it just a little lighter and a bit thinner. Xiaomi Redmi Note 10 features just a bit better looking display than Galaxy Note Fan Edition, because although it has a just a bit worse number of pixels per inch of screen and a bit lower 1080 x 2400 resolution, it also counts with a quite bigger display.
Galaxy Note Fan Edition has a bit superior CPU than Xiaomi Redmi Note 10. Both of them have a 4 GB RAM and 8 cores. Xiaomi Redmi Note 10 captures a bit better photos and videos than Samsung Galaxy Note Fan Edition, because although it has a tinier camera aperture, it also counts with a larger back camera sensor shooting better quality photos and videos and a way higher 48 mega-pixels resolution camera.
Xiaomi Redmi Note 10 counts with slightly more storage capacity for games and applications than Galaxy Note Fan Edition, and although they both have equal internal memory, the Xiaomi Redmi Note 10 also has an external memory slot that admits a maximum of 512 GB. The Xiaomi Redmi Note 10 counts with a superior battery duration than Samsung Galaxy Note Fan Edition, because it has a 5000mAh battery size instead of 3200mAh.
Although Galaxy Note Fan Edition is a better device, it is way more expensive than the Xiaomi Redmi Note 10, and it doesn't have such a good quality/price relation as Xiaomi Redmi Note 10. If you are trying to save a few dollars, you can buy the Xiaomi Redmi Note 10, and give up some specs and features, but you will get the most out of your budget.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.