Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 78.3 | 90.7 |
| Basic Information | |
| Xiaomi | Samsung |
| Android 11 | Android 14 |
| 2021-04-20 | -- |
| 6.32 x 2.93 x 0.33 inches | -- |
| 6.31 ounces | -- |
| Lake Green, Onyx Gray and Pebble White | -- |
| -- | Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass) and Titanium |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 199.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.4 inches | 6.8 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 3088 x 1440 pixels |
| AMOLED | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 411 pixels per inch | 501 pixels per inch |
| 1100 cd/m2 brightness | 2600 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 9 | 10.2 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 678 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 4 chipset |
| Kryo 460, 64-bit, 11 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor | processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 12 GB RAM |
| Adreno 612 GPU | Yes GPU |
| 9.18 | 6.21 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 11.74 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 13.00 MP | 200.00 MP + 12.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| -- | 24.00mm focal length |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | 0.77 inches (1/1.3") sensor |
| -- | 7680 x 4320 (30 fps) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 9.9 | 14.74 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Battery | 5000mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6.8 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.3 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Infra-red port | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra has an overall score of 90.7, which is better than the Xiaomi Redmi Note 10's global score of 78.3. Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra's body is way thinner and notably lighter than the Xiaomi Redmi Note 10. Both devices in this review include Android OS (operating system), but the Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra has a more recent 14 version and Xiaomi Redmi Note 10 has Android 11 version, giving some additional features.
The Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra counts with a sharper display than Xiaomi Redmi Note 10, because it has a just a little better display pixel density, a higher resolution of 1440 x 3088, a little bigger display and much more display brightness. Galaxy S25 Ultra features more storage to store more apps and games than Xiaomi Redmi Note 10, because although it has no slot for an SD memory card, it also counts with 256 GB internal storage capacity.
The Xiaomi Redmi Note 10 counts with a much faster processor than Galaxy S25 Ultra, although it has a lower amount of RAM, they both have the same number of cores. The Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra counts with a way better camera than Xiaomi Redmi Note 10, because it has a bigger camera aperture for better captures and videos in poorly lited situations, a lot higher resolution camera in the back and a much larger camera sensor which provides a way higher photo and video quality.
Galaxy S25 Ultra counts with a battery duration that is very similar to the battery performance in Xiaomi Redmi Note 10.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.