Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 78.3 | 79.5 |
| Basic Information | |
| Xiaomi | Samsung |
| Android 11 | -- |
| 2021-04-20 | 2016-03-11 |
| 6.32 x 2.93 x 0.33 inches | 5.61 x 2.74 x 0.31 inches |
| 6.31 ounces | 5.36 ounces |
| Lake Green, Onyx Gray and Pebble White | Black, Gold, Pink, Pink gold, Silver and White |
| -- | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 4) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 199.00 | $ 124.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.4 inches | 5.1 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) |
| AMOLED | Super AMOLED |
| 411 pixels per inch | 576 pixels per inch |
| 1100 cd/m2 brightness | 855 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 9 | 9.6 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 678 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 820 MSM8996 chipset |
| Kryo 460, 64-bit, 11 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor | Kryo, 64-bit, 14 nm (Quad-Core 2200 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 612 GPU | Adreno 530 GPU |
| 9.18 | 9 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 32 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 200 GB) external memory slot |
| 11.74 | 8.56 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 13.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 5.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | 0.4 inches (1/2.5") sensor |
| -- | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 9.9 | 9.79 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Battery | 3000mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6.8 | 4.96 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 4.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Infra-red port | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Galaxy S7 is slightly better than the Xiaomi Redmi Note 10, getting a global score of 79.5 against 78.3. Galaxy S7 is an extremely older cellphone than Xiaomi Redmi Note 10, but it is somewhat lighter and a little thinner anyway. The Xiaomi Redmi Note 10 features a bit faster processing unit than Samsung Galaxy S7, and although they both have a 4 GB RAM memory, the Xiaomi Redmi Note 10 also has a higher number of cores.
The Galaxy S7 counts with a bit sharper screen than Xiaomi Redmi Note 10, because although it has a way smaller display and much less brightness, it also counts with more pixels per inch in the display and a higher resolution of 1440 x 2560 pixels. The Xiaomi Redmi Note 10 takes a bit better photos and videos than Samsung Galaxy S7, because although it has a tinier aperture which is not good for shooting photographs and video in poorly lited situations, it also counts with a larger sensor capturing better quality pictures and a camera in the back with a much better 48 MP resolution.
The Xiaomi Redmi Note 10 counts with a superior storage for applications, games, photos and videos than Samsung Galaxy S7, because it has a SD extension slot that holds a maximum of 512 GB and 64 GB internal memory capacity. Xiaomi Redmi Note 10 has a really longer battery lifetime than Galaxy S7, because it has 5000mAh of battery capacity against 3000mAh.
In addition to being the best phone of the ones we are comparing, the Samsung Galaxy S7 is also a lot cheaper, which makes it a great choice.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.