Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 78.3 | 81.7 |
| Basic Information | |
| Xiaomi | Samsung |
| Android 11 | -- |
| 2021-04-20 | 2017-04-21 |
| 6.32 x 2.93 x 0.33 inches | 5.86 x 2.68 x 0.31 inches |
| 6.31 ounces | 5.47 ounces |
| Lake Green, Onyx Gray and Pebble White | Arctic silver, Burgundy red, Coral blue, Maple gold, Midnight black, Orchid gray and Rose pink |
| -- | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 199.00 | $ 173.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.4 inches | 5.8 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2960 x 1440 pixels |
| AMOLED | Super AMOLED |
| 411 pixels per inch | 568 pixels per inch |
| 1100 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 9 | 8.9 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 678 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 835 MSM8998 chipset |
| Kryo 460, 64-bit, 11 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor | Kryo 280, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2350 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 612 GPU | Adreno 540 GPU |
| 9.18 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 256 GB) external memory slot |
| 11.74 | 10.78 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 13.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| -- | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 9.9 | 9.79 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Battery | 3000mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6.8 | 4.96 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0, EDR |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Infra-red port | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Galaxy S8 has an overall score of 81.7, which is just a bit better than the Xiaomi Redmi Note 10's 78.3 overall score. Galaxy S8's design is somewhat lighter and a little thinner than the Xiaomi Redmi Note 10, despite of the fact that it was released 4 years before. Xiaomi Redmi Note 10 features a bit better screen than Samsung Galaxy S8, because although it has a lot worse screen pixel density and a way lower resolution of 1080 x 2400px, it also counts with a quite larger display.
The Xiaomi Redmi Note 10 counts with slightly more memory for apps and games than Galaxy S8, and although they both have equal 64 GB internal memory capacity, the Xiaomi Redmi Note 10 also has a SD memory slot that supports up to 512 GB. The Samsung Galaxy S8 counts with a bit better performance than Xiaomi Redmi Note 10. Both of them have the same number of cores and the same RAM amount.
Xiaomi Redmi Note 10 shoots slightly better videos and photos than Samsung Galaxy S8, because although it has a tinier camera aperture which is worse for taking pictures and/or video in low-light situations, it also counts with a way larger back camera sensor capturing way better quality videos and photos and a back camera with a much higher resolution.
The Xiaomi Redmi Note 10 counts with a way better battery performance than Samsung Galaxy S8, because it has a 67% bigger battery capacity.
Samsung Galaxy S8 not only is the best devices in our current comparison, but it's also cheap compared to the other phone, making it an easy choice.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.