Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 78.3 | 81 |
| Basic Information | |
| Xiaomi | Samsung |
| Android 11 | Android 11, 10 |
| 2021-04-20 | 2020-01-31 |
| 6.32 x 2.93 x 0.33 inches | 6.30 x 3.02 x 0.39 inches |
| 6.31 ounces | 7.76 ounces |
| Lake Green, Onyx Gray and Pebble White | Black |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 199.00 | $ 421.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.4 inches | 6.3 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| AMOLED | IPS LCD |
| 411 pixels per inch | 409 pixels per inch |
| 1100 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 9 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 678 chipset | Samsung Exynos 9611 chipset |
| Kryo 460, 64-bit, 11 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor | ARM Cortex-A73 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 612 GPU | Mali-G72 MP3 GPU |
| 9.18 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 11.74 | 11.74 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 13.00 MP | 25.00 MP + 13.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | 0.25 inches (1/4") sensor |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (480 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 9.9 | 9.79 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Battery | 4050mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Removable Battery |
| 6.8 | 6 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Infra-red port | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Samsung Galaxy XCover Pro is slightly better than Xiaomi Redmi Note 10, getting an 81 score against 78.3. Both of these phones include the same Android 11 OS. Although it's the best cellphone in this comparison, Samsung Galaxy XCover Pro's construction is older, thicker and heavier than the Xiaomi Redmi Note 10.
Samsung Galaxy XCover Pro counts with a bit faster CPU than Xiaomi Redmi Note 10. Both have the same number of cores and a 4 GB RAM. The Xiaomi Redmi Note 10 counts with a much better display than Galaxy XCover Pro, because it has a little bit higher resolution of 1080 x 2400, a little better count of pixels in each display inch and a little bigger screen.
The Samsung Galaxy XCover Pro's memory capacity to install games and applications is just as good as the Xiaomi Redmi Note 10 one, both have a slot for SD memory cards that allows up to 512 GB and exactly the same 64 GB internal memory. The Xiaomi Redmi Note 10 counts with improved battery lifetime than Samsung Galaxy XCover Pro, because it has 5000mAh of battery capacity.
Xiaomi Redmi Note 10 counts with just a bit better camera than Galaxy XCover Pro, because although it has a smaller aperture which is not recommended for shooting photographs and videos in poorly lited environments, it also counts with a much more mega-pixels camera and a much bigger sensor taking more light and vivid colors.
Although Galaxy XCover Pro is a better device, it is way more expensive than the Xiaomi Redmi Note 10, and it doesn't have such a good price and quality relation as the Xiaomi Redmi Note 10. So if you need that extra features, you can buy the Galaxy XCover Pro, but if you don't you can save some money and buy the Xiaomi Redmi Note 10, letting go a couple specifications.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.